Actually, after seeing the clarifications provided to Dean, I now oppose this
proposal as written.
Owen
On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:21 , Masato Yamanishi myama...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Regarding prop-113, I saw 3 very simple support and 1 clarification without
any negative
This proposal seems to advocates two things:
The removal of any requirement for organisations to be multihomed
The removal of any needs based allocation for IPv4 address allocation.
The proposed wording states:
Section 3.3: Criteria for small delegations
An organization is eligible if it
Hi Dean
This proposal seems to advocates two things:
The removal of any requirement for organisations to be multihomed
Yes,
The removal of any needs based allocation for IPv4 address allocation.
Not exactly.
The proposed wording states:
Section 3.3: Criteria for small delegations
Personally I support it.
On 3 February 2015 at 23:26, Masato Yamanishi myama...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear SIG members
The proposal prop-113: Modification in the IPv4 eligibility criteria
has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 39 in
