Dear EC.
Since you will be meeting soon in person with the members, I want to raise
this topic again as an APNIC member and also a member of the APNIC
community . While I understand the EC's authority in determining fee
structures without mandatory community input, the community support for a
Thanks Chris, appreciate your replies.
I won't give it comment line-by-line though it gives me far more insight.
Take what the SIG feels has value from what I've sent, disregard the rest!
Many thanks,
Luke
On 14/12/2023 10:13 am, Christopher Hawker wrote:
Hi Luke,
See comments in-line.
Hi Luke,
See comments in-line.
> I am not adequately versed in the nuances of what makes the EC's last-minute
> decision something permissible, yet don't feel like what's taken place this
> week re: prop-155 demonstrates a properly functional process.
> prop-155 reached consensus and was
Hi,
This all seems quite disappointing, when it should have been quite
positive. SIG-Policy was 'that close' it seems, and I'd like to dig into
how such a change is possible. Being candid, I am not adequately versed
in the nuances of what makes the EC's last-minute decision something
I too, agree with Aftab, and strongly urge that the EC reconsiders the fees for
IPv6 PI space.
The idea to this policy was to increase and incentivise the uptake of IPv6. By
charging the same costs as other delegations, it effectively renders this
entire policy proposal redundant as there is
I echo Aftab's position. As the endorsement is with a rider which is
different from the consensus arrived at OPM/AGM, then as per the APNIC 111
(APNIC Policy Development Process), Section 4, Step 5, EC can refer the
proposal back to Policy SIG for discussions.
Regards
Anupam Agrawal
On Wed, Dec
I seconded the Aftab's opinion.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 05:59, Aftab Siddiqui
wrote:
> I urge the EC to revisit the decision on the fee waiver. The policy's
> intent was to promote the uptake of PI IPv6 by balancing incentivization
> with the recovery of costs for services
I urge the EC to revisit the decision on the fee waiver. The policy's
intent was to promote the uptake of PI IPv6 by balancing incentivization
with the recovery of costs for services provided to resource holders. A
12-month fee waiver, unfortunately fails horribly to meet this purpose and
