I do not support this proposal as I have complete trust in the current APNIC
PDP and this community.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 2:13 AM
To: Policy
I support this proposal. Thanks to Jordi for continuously working to simplify
the policy text.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 5:59 PM
To: Policy SIG
I do not support this proposal. Intention is good but no one is really
concerned nor can verify this in practice. I think the current policy text is
good.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed
will effect the service
delivery and/or network downtime.
I request APNIC to provide a detailed review of this proposal from a service
and legal perspective so the community can better understand the
implementation, if this proposal reaches consensus.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and
Yes but the proposed text is not clear. In with the current policy text, LIRs
are not allowed to make sub-assignments from their assigned address space
outside of their infrastructure. So I do not support this change in policy.
J Khan
From: sig-policy-boun...@li
ion. Right?
J Khan
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 23/8/19 16:01, "Javed Khan"
mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net>
en nombre de javedkha...@outlook.com<mailto:javedkha...@outlook.com>> escribió:
I do not support this proposal. Intention is good but no
Thanks Srinivas. I understand and may be its premature to ask for legal review
of this proposal but at least if we can get APNIC proposed implementation that
might help.
J Khan
From: Srinivas Chendi
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2019 7:25 AM
To: Javed Khan
Cc
the PDP update (which is a new
version from a the previous year proposal), that one of my proposals will be
considered by the chairs as out-of-scope. Clarification just so nobody believes
that it is related to that rejection! Chairs can confirm that.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 2
hey cannot
afford but accept the stuff ups.
So I am not in favor of asking the RIR to create AS0 ROA.
J Khan
From: Aftab Siddiqui
Sent: Tuesday, 27 August 2019 6:16 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: Javed Khan ; Policy SIG ;
Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-132
