Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-132, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Please note that these discussion is based on the first Proposal, prop-132

Re: [sig-policy] prop-131-v001: Editorial changes in IPv6 Policy

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-131, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a opposing for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-130, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124,based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 177, Issue 4

2019-02-23 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
the prefix size to "minimum" which will be never changed before IPv4 exhaustion. Thanks, Satoru Tsurumaki 2019年2月23日(土) 1:32 Md. abdullah Al naser : > Hi Satoru, > > I hope you are fine. It's really great to hear from you that, you have > already arranged a local

Re: [sig-policy] prop-129-v001: Abolish Waiting list for unmet IPv4 requests

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-129, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with the reason

Re: [sig-policy] prop-128-v001: Multihoming not required for ASN

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-128, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed, subject to not deleting the "it

Re: [sig-policy] Prop-127 announcement : Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address, pool to a /23

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-127, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Almost half of participants were oppose the proposal and almost other half

Re: [sig-policy] Version 3 - prop-126 PDP Update

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal. But a few

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-version 5: Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

2019-02-21 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124, based on a meeting we organized on 12th Feb to discuss these proposals. Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons

Re: [sig-policy] prop-126-v001 : PDP Update

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-126,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.* *Many supporting opinions were expressed about the point of confirming consensus

Re: [sig-policy] prop-125-v001: Validation of "abuse-mailbox" and other IRT emails

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-125,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal. - Agree, you should. - When mail

Re: [sig-policy] Prop124 version 4

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-124,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.However, also many concerning comment

Re: [sig-policy] A new version of the proposal "prop-118: No need policy in APNIC region"

2018-09-10 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
*Dear Colleagues,I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum.I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-118,based on a meeting we organised on 22nd Aug to discuss these proposals.Many supporting opinions were expressed on this proposal.However, many comments were expressed

Re: [sig-policy] prop-126-v001 : PDP Update

2018-08-16 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Proposer I have a question at STEP 1 of your proposal. It seems to mean that the proposer can submit their proposal one week before the start of OPM, but there will be no discussion or consensus call at the OPM if proposer submit the proposal after four-week deadline. Is it correct or typo

Re: [sig-policy] prop-120-v002: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan

2018-02-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 31st Jan to discuss these proposals. Many supporting comment expressed on this proposal. Japanese community

Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 164, Issue 10

2018-01-30 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Sep 2017 should be limited to one. Would you please give us your opinion ? BTW, About 60%+ 103/8 has already allocated. Therefore, the consensus of prop-123 means a substantial abolition of prop-116. We need re-think why prop-116 was consensus. Thanks, Satoru Tsurumaki 2018-01-29 20:09 GMT+0

Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy

2018-01-29 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
? Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki JPOPF Steering Team (former JPNIC Policy Working Group) 2018-01-26 12:27 GMT+09:00 Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherr...@micrologic.nc>: > Dear SIG members, > > The proposal "prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy" has >

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

2017-09-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
osal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 > allocation" > > Dear Colleagues, > > > I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. > > I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-121, > based on a meeting we organised on 5th Se

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-09-13 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
on feedback from the Japanese community. 2017-09-08 17:52 GMT+08:00 David Hilario <d.hila...@laruscloudservice.net>: > Dear Satoru, > > Thank you for conveying the feedback here. > > > On 8 September 2017 at 09:32, Satoru Tsurumaki > <satoru.tsurum...@g.softbank.co

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-122-v001: Updating "Subsequent IPv6 allocation " policy

2017-09-08 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-122, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many opposing comments were expressed with the same reasons as for prop-121

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-121: Updating "InitialIPv6 allocation"

2017-09-08 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-121, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many opposing comments were expressed on the proposal with reasons below

Re: [sig-policy] New proposal prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan

2017-09-08 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Many support expressed on clarifying how IPv4 addresses should be distributed

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-08 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-116, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with reasons below. * Transfer

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-08-18 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
dly remove all the listing. REPEAT. agree. This proposal support the spammer and the LIR who support or earn income from the spammer. I'm afraid that those spammer and LIR can transfer the address resources more freely and frequency if both prop-119 and prop-118 will be a consensus. Satoru Tsur

Re: [sig-policy] prop-119: Temporary transfers, to be discussed at APNIC 44 Polic y SIG

2017-08-17 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
way. After that, the source organization might be "laundering" the address from SPAM DB, then lease this address to another spammers. I think we should oppose the proposal which might support the spammer. regards, Satoru Tsurumaki 2017-08-09 15:16 GMT+09:00 chku <c...@twnic.net.