Exactly. As explained many times in the list and in the meeting today, the
proposal doesn’t change the situation, just clarify it: leasing *in any form*
is not allowed.
Could you please if IPXO justified the need in APNIC or any other RIRs,
indicating that the addresses will be used for
This is not a proposal about if Leasing should be allow/disallowed, but
to make something clear in the policy text about what already exists and
is what it is.
Fernando
On 14/09/2022 10:35, Evelina Eidukaitė via sig-policy wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
My name is Evelina, I represent IPXO, the
Dear Colleagues,
My name is Evelina, I represent IPXO, the largest IP leasing platform and we
don’t support the proposal "prop-148-v003: Clarification - Leasing of Resources
is not Acceptable", because it opposes to the concept of free, open, and equal
Internet.
1. Growing scarcity of
This late edit retains false information regarding the situation at RIPE even
though it has been clarified on this list.
The new proposal states:
" Nothing is currently mentioned in RIPE about this and it is not acceptable as
a justification of the need."
And this is patently false. RIPE does
