Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-11 Thread Rajesh Panwala
Dear Team, I also support Mr. Ajay. For M one can't predict. Policy should accomodate M cases. Rajesh Panwala On 12-Sep-2017 10:04 AM, "Ajai Kumar" wrote: > Dear Policy chair, > I personally partial support if M& A case be excluded as no one knows when > M case can come

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-11 Thread Ajai Kumar
Dear Policy chair, I personally partial support if M& A case be excluded as no one knows when M case can come into picture looking at the business of company. Regards, Ajai Kumar On 8 September 2017 at 14:31, Satoru Tsurumaki < satoru.tsurum...@g.softbank.co.jp> wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > >

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-10 Thread Jahangir Hossain
I again put my support this proposal as i have done before . *Regards / Jahangir * On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:12 PM, chku wrote: > Dear SIG members > > A new version of the proposal "prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 > addresses in the final /8 block" has been sent to

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-08 Thread 藤崎智宏
Dear Adam, Thank you so much for reviewing my proposal, and I'm sorry for replying late. 2017-09-01 17:08 GMT+09:00 Adam Gosling : > > - Would the prohibition apply to resources that are received as the result of > a transfer? Or does this proposal only apply to delegations

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-08 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Policy Working Group in Japan. I would like to share key feedback in our community for prop-116, based on a meeting we organised on 5th Sep to discuss these proposals. Substantial support expressed for the proposal with reasons below. * Transfer of

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-09-01 Thread Adam Gosling
sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] De la part de chku Envoyé : mercredi 9 août 2017 17:12 À : sig-policy <sig-pol...@apnic.net> Objet : [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-08-23 Thread Stephane MATEO
[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] De la part de chku Envoyé : mercredi 9 août 2017 17:12 À : sig-policy <sig-pol...@apnic.net> Objet : [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block Dear SIG members A new version of the proposal

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-08-23 Thread Ernest Tse
​Hi all, - Do you support or oppose the proposal? I don`t support this proposal. - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? It is blocking the freedom of internet included business transfer or marketing selling. - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? I

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-08-23 Thread Ernest Tse
​Hi all, I don`t support for this policy. Reason: Best Regards, Ernest Tse Pacswitch Globe Telecom Ltd. // Web:

Re: [sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-08-23 Thread Masato Yamanishi
Hi Tomohiro and All, While I support the rational of this proposal, I would like to suggest excluding M transfer from the scope and allowing it as it is. I don't think v4 space allocated from final /8 to the company which is a target of M would become a deal breaker of "real" M Rather, people who

[sig-policy] [Sig-policy] New version of prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block

2017-08-09 Thread chku
Dear SIG members A new version of the proposal "prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 44 which will be held in Taichung, Taiwan on Wednesday and Thursday, 14 & 15