Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-09-02 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
cy/proposals/prop-132 > > Regards > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > -- > > prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons > > -

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-21 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
pose and documentation of this intent should be done through the >>>>> IETF and be documented in an STD or RFC. >>>>> >>>>> I support the idea, but I believe the proper place to start is the >>>>> IETF. >>>>> >>>>>

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-21 Thread Owen DeLong
documented in an STD or RFC. >>>>> >>>>> I support the idea, but I believe the proper place to start is the IETF. >>>>> >>>>> Owen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 9, 2019, at 3:01 AM, Sumon Ahmed Sabir

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-21 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear SIG members, >>>> >>>> The proposal "prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons" has been sent to >>>> the Policy SIG for review. >>>> >>&g

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-21 Thread Owen DeLong
; <mailto:sasa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear SIG members, >>>>> >>>>> The proposal "prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons" has been sent to >>>>> the

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
Hi Andrew, Good suggestion, it makes more sense and very well noted. I will made the change accordingly. Let me see if any other suggestions comes out later today otherwise I will update the policy. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Dul wrote: > Hello! > On

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
comment on the proposal on the mailing list >>> before the meeting. >>> >>> The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an >>> important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Andrew Dul
Hello! On 8/15/2019 5:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: Hi Andrew, On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather than by an RIR from what you quoted. Yes, for resources

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
Hi Andrew, > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > >> Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather >> than by an RIR from what you quoted. >> > > Yes, for resources not allocated by IANA or marked as Reserved But IANA > has nothing to do with resources

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Owen DeLong
>>>>>> >>>>>> It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in >>>>>> Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 September 2019. >>>>>> >>>>>> We invite you to review and comment on the proposal

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Andrew Dul
roposal to make it more     effective? Information about this proposal is available at: http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132 Regards Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng APNIC Policy SIG Chairs --------------

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
roblem you are experiencing? If so, >> tell the community about your situation. >> - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? >> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? >> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more >>

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-15 Thread Owen DeLong
ou see any disadvantages in this proposal? >> - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? >> - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more >> effective? >> >> Information about this proposal is available at: >> http://www.apnic.net/pol

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-14 Thread Md. Abdul Awal
al? >>   - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? >>   - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more >>     effective? >> >> Information about this proposal is available at: >> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132 >> >> Regards &

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-14 Thread Md. Abdul Awal
al? >>   - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? >>   - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more >>     effective? >> >> Information about this proposal is available at: >> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132 >> >> Regards &

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-14 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
? > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more > effective? > > Information about this proposal is available at: > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132 > > Regards > > Sumon, B

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-09 Thread Owen DeLong
ttp://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132> > > Regards > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > -- > > prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons > > ---

[sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-09 Thread Sumon Ahmed Sabir
e at: http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132 Regards Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng APNIC Policy SIG Chairs ------ prop-132-v001: AS0 for Bogons -- Propo