Hi Job,
I raised these questions as part of my presentation and happy to respond
here as well.
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:10 AM Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Since we are in final comment period, I’d like to learn more about the
> below questions.
>
> Kind
Dear all,
Since we are in final comment period, I’d like to learn more about the
below questions.
Kind regards,
Job
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 17:32 Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm happy to see the proposal has been updated, I think it'll make
> discussion easier.
>
> I have some
Dear all,
I'm happy to see the proposal has been updated, I think it'll make
discussion easier.
I have some questions:
1/ How much trouble are those ~ 100 prefixes actually causing the
community? I'm sure we all agree that its not fair that these
entities are announcing space that
consideration is necessary for the implementation.
Regards,
Hiroki
---
Hiroki Kawabata
Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)
Subject: [sig-policy] prop-132 new version email draft (003)
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 11:45:32 +1100
From: Bertrand Cherrier
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-132: RPKI ROAs for unallocated and
unassigned APNIC address space (was: AS0 for Bogons)" has been sent to
the Policy SIG for review.
Information about earlier versions is available from:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-132
You
