Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 177, Issue 4

2019-02-23 Thread Satoru Tsurumaki
Hi Abdullah, Thank you for your comment. I think Japanese community not oppose to decrease the maximum prefix size it self, but concern that it will be more difficult to make a consensus of decreasing /23 to /24 or shorter in the future. So in this time, they think it should be decreased the pre

Re: [sig-policy] sig-policy Digest, Vol 177, Issue 4

2019-02-22 Thread Md. abdullah Al naser
Hi Satoru, I hope you are fine. It's really great to hear from you that, you have already arranged a local discussion on prop-127. As mentioned in proposal, decreasing the maximum allocation size from /22 to /23 can prolong the last 103/8 pool so more small startups can still be connected with m