Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
I’m not interpreting the PDP as part of that, however, I’m fine if the staff confirms that it is in-scope according to their understanding. We have a recent experience of policies (resource hijacking is a policy violation) being declared out-of-scope in ARIN by the AC. I know the PDP is

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread Srinivas Chendi
Hi Jordi, Thanks for your contribution to this discussion so far. As per the SIG Guidelines, Policy SIG Chair is responsible to accept or reject a proposal and to check if it is in scope of the active SIG charter. Please refer to the section 2.4 of SIG Guidelines

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread Srinivas Chendi
Thanks Jordi. FYI, consulting with our technical team about this. Regards Sunny On 15/05/2019 12:20 am, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi Aftab, > > If you don’t get my emails in the list, it may be due to DMARC. Email > servers (such as mine), using DMARC, may get rejected by clients of >

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread Aftab Siddiqui
Hi Jordi, You can always bring any topic to apnic-talk mailing list for discussion. Not everything has to be discussed on policy-sig mailing list. And somehow I’m not receiving your emails sent to the policy-sig mailing list :) On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 11:15 pm, Srinivas Chendi wrote: > Hi

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread Owen DeLong
My own opinion only and not speaking on behalf of or for the AC... In the case of ARIN, your proposal was not to modify the PDP and addressed primarily the detailed operational practices of ARIN staff. It did not address the administration and registration of number resources, but rather the

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
I guess I confused you. I was not mixing two things. One example was the PDP update in APNIC (or other regions), another example was the rejection because considered out-of-scope of the "resource hijacking proposal". Regards, Jordi El 14/5/19 16:08, "Owen DeLong" escribió: My own

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Sunny, I understand that, however, that's the reason for having a proper charter, so the chairs have a "base" to take a decision. If the text of the charter is not clear, then even if they want to accept a policy proposal, they can't. Regards, Jordi El 14/5/19 15:15, "Srinivas

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread Amrita
Apologies for the delay in responding, I agree to Paul’s version as it is succinct and addresses the concern for which the SIG Charter. Regards From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 9:21 AM

Re: [sig-policy] Amendment of SIG Charter

2019-05-14 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Aftab, If you don’t get my emails in the list, it may be due to DMARC. Email servers (such as mine), using DMARC, may get rejected by clients of mailing lists if the mailing list is keeping my email instead of using the list one. It may happen that the APNIC list is not correctly