Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-08-23 Thread Javed Khan
I do not support this proposal as I have complete trust in the current APNIC PDP and this community. Kind regards Javed Khan MSCE and CCSP From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 2:13 AM To: Policy

Re: [sig-policy] prop-131-v001: Editorial changes in IPv6 Policy

2019-08-23 Thread Javed Khan
I support this proposal. Thanks to Jordi for continuously working to simplify the policy text. Kind regards Javed Khan MSCE and CCSP From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 5:59 PM To: Policy SIG

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-08-23 Thread Javed Khan
I do not support this proposal. Intention is good but no one is really concerned nor can verify this in practice. I think the current policy text is good. Kind regards Javed Khan MSCE and CCSP From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net on behalf of Sumon Ahmed

Re: [sig-policy] prop-131-v001: Editorial changes in IPv6 Policy

2019-08-23 Thread Simon Sohel Baroi / Global Business / 01847102243 /
Dear Sir, Requesting to the Author to represent the Proposal with Example and Graphical Representation. The example should have comparison with Present situation and the Propose Solution of the problem. - with regards SIMON. On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:59 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote: > > Dear

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-08-23 Thread Simon Sohel Baroi / Global Business / 01847102243 /
Dear Sir, Also, Requesting to the Author to represent the Proposal with Example and Graphical Representation. The example should have comparison with Present situation and the Propose Solution of the problem. - with regards SIMON. On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 8:33 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote: >

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v002: AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-23 Thread Javed Khan
For now, I'm neither for or against this proposal. I think the intention of the author is good but the implementation is not as easy as is explained in the proposal. QoS is very crucial for ISPs to sustain the fierce market competition and if APNIC fails to timely update the AS0 ROAs, this will

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-08-23 Thread Owen DeLong
I think the current text isn’t really a problem because reasonable people apply a reasonable interpretation of intent rather than the literal meaning. The proposal brings literal meaning more in line with well understood intent. While I don’t believe there is an actual problem to solve here,