Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Satoru, Thanks for investing time in the several policy proposals. I think that the last couple of emails could help all you to better understand the problem. Clearly, if different people read the current policy text in a different way, it will be much better to find a way so we have a

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Owen, El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" escribió: On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:05 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: Hi Javed, I don’t agree, let me explain why. The current process only talks about the meeting and the chairs have clearly indicated that they take in

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Dear Saturo, See responses below, in-line. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 2/9/19 17:37, "Satoru Tsurumaki" escribió: Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team. I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based

Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Satoru, all, There are two points here: 1) Provide clarity about Inter/Intra-RIR. It is not clear in actual policy if it is referring only to Intra-RIR M or also Inter-RIR. It seems clear that because there is a policy for Inter-RIR transfers, the M should also support Inter-RIR. 2) The

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Javed, Anything we do (all) in our personal and professional lives, is subjected to laws. Any organization rules, is bound to laws, we like it or not. Clearly, we can’t say in a policy, if we don’t like a guy, we can discriminate him and not provide him resources, or allow him to

Re: [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: prop-130-v001: Modification of transfer policies

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Hiroki, all, Thanks for your inputs, allow me to clarify below, in-line. El 6/9/19 16:25, "Hiroki Kawabata" escribió: Hi all, About the part of IPv6, we oppose this. other parts are neutral. We have to make efforts to aggrigate IPv6 routes and to maintain sparse

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Owen, all, Sorry the late answer … been too busy the last weeks. Responses below, in-line. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 27/8/19 8:05, "Owen DeLong" escribió: On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:19 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: Hi Javed, I think you’re getting

Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments

2019-09-09 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Hi Javed, I actually think this is in the other way around. I believe you’re confusing different terms, clearly described in the definitions section of the policy manual: 2.2.1. Delegated address space APNIC "delegates" addresses to its account holders. These delegations can be for

Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update

2019-09-09 Thread Owen DeLong
I took the liberty of reformatting the message into a consistent font and size. > On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:41 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > wrote: > > Hi Owen, > > > El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" mailto:o...@delong.com>> > escribió: > > > > >> On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:05 , JORDI PALET