Dear guys I do support this draft of policy 👍
Regards Apipol Thailand On Sat, 19 Jan 2562 at 09:00 <sig-policy-requ...@lists.apnic.net> wrote: > Send sig-policy mailing list submissions to > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sig-policy-requ...@lists.apnic.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sig-policy-ow...@lists.apnic.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sig-policy digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Prop-127 announcement : Change maximum delegation size of > 103/8 IPv4 address, pool to a /23 (Bertrand Cherrier) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 17:17:15 +1100 > From: "Bertrand Cherrier" <b.cherr...@micrologic.nc> > To: "Policy SIG" <sig-pol...@apnic.net> > Subject: [sig-policy] Prop-127 announcement : Change maximum > delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address, pool to a /23 > Message-ID: <8f8c7de0-6cdc-4064-a521-ae7721e5c...@micrologic.nc> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Dear SIG members, > > The proposal "prop-127-v001: Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 > IPv4 address pool to a /23" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. > > It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 47 in > Daejeon, South Korea on Wednesday, 27 February 2019. > > We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list > before the meeting. > > The comment period on the mailing list before an APNIC meeting is an > important part of the policy development process. We encourage you to > express your views on the proposal: > > - Do you support or oppose this proposal? > - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so, > tell the community about your situation. > - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more > effective? > > Information about this proposal is available at: > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-127 > > Regards > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > prop-127-v001: Change maximum delegation size of 103/8 IPv4 address > pool to a /23 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Proposers: Ching-Heng Ku, Aftab Siddiqui, Yen-Chieh Wang > c...@twnic.tw > > > 1. Problem Statement > -------------------- > > This is a proposal to change the maximum size of IPv4 address delegations > from the APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool [1] to a /23. > > 2. Objective of policy change > ----------------------------- > > The current final /8 allocation policy[1] requires that the current minimum > delegation size for IPv4 is a /24 and each APNIC account holder is only > eligible > to receive IPv4 address delegations totalling a maximum /22 from the > APNIC 103/8 > IPv4 address pool. > > According to the APNIC IPv4 Address Report, https://ipv4.potaroo.net/, > remaining > addresses in the APNIC 103/8 pool are 42.8%, 33.3%, 23.4% of /8 in the > end of > 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. The remaining number of APNIC 103/8 > IPv4 > address pool for APNIC account holder is less and less. It is predicted > that > the 103/8 pool will be exhausted in 2020. > > Reducing the maximum IPv4 delegation size from APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address > pool can > prolong the exhaustion time of the 103/8. Newcomers of APNIC account > holders will > have the benefit in this period of time. New companies can obtain some > IPv4 address > space in the APNIC service region without the need to trade for address > space and > can make the preparation for the subsequent IPv6 migration. > > It is recommended that the number of assigned IPv4 addresses in Final /8 > be reduced > from a maximum of /22 to /23. It will be estimated to extend the > exhaustion time > for at least three years or more. > > 3. Situation in other regions > ----------------------------- > > There is no similar policy in place in other RIR regions. > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > It is proposed to modify the 6.1 Minimum and maximum IPv4 delegations of > the APNIC > Internet Number Resource Policies[1]. > > This proposal is to change the maximum size of IPv4 address delegations > from the > APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool[1] to a /23. /23 is important because new > ISPs can > use /24 for internal infrastructure and /24 customer assignments and NAT > for IPv6 > transition. > > Current Policy text > > Each APNIC account holder is only eligible to receive IPv4 address > delegations > totalling a maximum /22 from the APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool. > > New Policy text > > Each APNIC account holder without APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address delegations > from the > APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool is only eligible to receive a maximum /23 > from the > APNIC 103/8 IPv4 address pool. > > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > ----------------------------- > > Advantages: > - This proposal allows a greater range of networks to access the > resources in > the final /8. > > - This proposal extends the maximum possible total number of networks > that can > benefit from the final /8 pool from around 16,000 to around 18,000 > networks, > providing small amounts of IPv4 to be available for networks, developing > economy, > etc., making the transition to IPv6 for many years to come. > > Disadvantages: > - No disadvantages are foreseen. > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > ----------------------------- > > It reduces the maximum size of the delegated address block available to > APNIC > members during the final /8 phase. This will affect NIR members in the > same way > as APNIC members. > > > 7. References > ------------- > > [1] Section 6.1. "Minimum and maximum IPv4 delegations" of "Policies for > IPv4 address > space management in the Asia Pacific region" > https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/resources#Part-2-IPv4-Policy > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/attachments/20190118/e5dc8edd/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > End of sig-policy Digest, Vol 176, Issue 6 > ****************************************** >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
