Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 default allocation size

2014-01-31 Thread David Farmer
a larger range, but not requiring a larger range. Thanks. -- David Farmer Email: far...@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1

Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria

2015-02-27 Thread David Farmer
Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) d...@internetnz.net.nz To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. -- === David Farmer Email: far...@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University

Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria

2015-02-27 Thread David Farmer
On 2/27/15 17:41 , Dean Pemberton wrote: On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:03 AM, David Farmer far...@umn.edu wrote: Don't allocated one if they don't want one. But if they want one, and they already have PI, or getting new PI, then why say no? And its not regardless of need, more accurately

Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal] prop-114: Modification in the ASN eligibility criteria

2015-02-25 Thread David Farmer
. -- David Farmer Email: far...@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v002: AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-28 Thread David Farmer
ose other ROAs are not > originated by RIRs and cannot come into existence as a result of > disagreement between an ISP and an RIR (e.g. a billing dispute with an RIR). > > This does, in fact, substantially expand the power of the RIR to impact > ROAs. That is reality. > > I haven’t decid

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v002: AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-22 Thread David Farmer
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 PM Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > Hi David, > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:36 AM David Farmer wrote: > >> The problem statement says; >> >> Bogons are defined in RFC3871, A "Bogon" (plural: "bogons") is a packet >

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v002: AS0 for Bogons

2019-08-22 Thread David Farmer
No impact to APNIC or respective NIR resource holders not implementing > ROV. Those implementing ROV > and discarding the invalids will not see any bogons in their routing table. > > > 7. References > --- > RFC6483 - https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6483.txt > RFC6491 - https://too

[sig-policy] Re: New proposal: prop-158-v001: IPv6 auto-allocation for each IPv4 request

2024-01-24 Thread David Farmer via SIG-policy
ination of the agreement except under the most egregious violation and only after both informal and formal opportunities to correct the situation. Can we please get back to the policy discussion at hand? Thanks. -- === David Farmer

[sig-policy] Re: New proposal: prop-158-v001: IPv6 auto-allocation for each IPv4 request

2024-01-24 Thread David Farmer via SIG-policy
policy has not been and will not be an effective lever to increase IPv6 implementations. Thanks. -- === David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota