Hi All,

Why we are so specific (last /8).

As per my view there should be no market transfer other than M&A.

Nitin

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:41 PM, 藤崎智宏 <fujis...@syce.net> wrote:

> Hi Yu-ya,
>
> Thank you so much for your comment.
>
> Mike also mentioned about M&A in his first mail (thank you, Mike),
> I'll revise my proposal to consider that.
>
> Yours Sincerely,
> ---
> Tomohiro Fujisaki
>
>
> 2016-09-21 9:28 GMT+09:00 Yuya KAWAKAMI <kawak...@mfeed.ad.jp>:
> > I'd like to support the purpose of this proposal itself but I'm afraid
> that
> > anyone who want to obtain more IPv4 addresses seriously will try to do
> M&A,
> > as Mike mentioned. I wonder if there can be better way to prevent such
> kind
> > of transfer.
> >
> > Paul and George,
> > Thank you for providing helpful statistics!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yuya
> >
> > On 2016/09/21 05:11, Masato Yamanishi wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Colleagues,
> >>
> >> Regardding this prop-116, I have not yet seen any support, opposition,
> or
> >> comment, except one clarification made by Mike Jager.
> >> So, let me ask you to express your views for this proposal on the list
> >> more since the meeting is reaching within 2 weeks.
> >>
> >> Mike> Can you advise your opinion for prop-116 after seeing the number
> of
> >> tranfers in 103/8 by market and M&A?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matt
> >>
> >>
> >> 2016-09-08 15:53 GMT+09:00 George Kuo <geo...@apnic.net
> >> <mailto:geo...@apnic.net>>:
> >>
> >>     Hi Mike,
> >>
> >>
> >>     On 7/09/2016 8:09 AM, Mike Jager wrote:
> >>
> >>             This proposal does not prohibit transfers due to M&A.
> >> Transfers of 103/8
> >>
> >>             block due to M&A continues to be allowed, based on the M&A
> >> transfer
> >>
> >>             procedures.
> >>
> >>
> >>         I had always assumed that anyone trying to get more than one
> >> allocation of 103/8 was creating a separate entity, obtaining APNIC
> >> membership, receiving the 103/8 allocation, and then using the M&A
> process
> >> to transfer it to their original entity.
> >>
> >>         If this is the case, the proposal will be ineffective at
> stopping
> >> this.
> >>
> >>         Does APNIC have any information on the relative number of
> >> transfers within 103/8 that have happened as part of M&As?
> >>
> >>
> >>     I have included two tables here for your reference. The numbers for
> >> Market transfers are available as part of the public transfer logs.
> >> (ftp://ftp.apnic.net/public/transfers/
> >> <ftp://ftp.apnic.net/public/transfers/>)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     1) M&A transfers containing 103/8 space
> >>
> >>     +------+-----------+-----------+-
> >>     |      |   Total   | Number of |
> >>     | Year | Transfers |   /24s    |
> >>     +------+-----------+-----------+-
> >>     | 2011 |         3 |         12 |
> >>     | 2012 |        10 |         46 |
> >>     | 2013 |        18 |         66 |
> >>     | 2014 |       126 |        498 |
> >>     | 2015 |       147 |        573 |
> >>     | 2016 |        45 |        177 |
> >>     +------+-----------+------------+-
> >>
> >>     2) Market transfers containing 103/8 space
> >>
> >>     +------+-----------+-----------+
> >>     |      |   Total   | Number of |
> >>     | Year | Transfers |   /24s    |
> >>     +------+-----------+-----------+
> >>     | 2011 |         2 |         2 |
> >>     | 2012 |        21 |        68 |
> >>     | 2013 |        16 |        61 |
> >>     | 2014 |        25 |        95 |
> >>     | 2015 |        67 |       266 |
> >>     | 2016 |        56 |       206 |
> >>     +------+-----------+-----------+
> >>
> >>     Thanks,
> >>
> >>     George K
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         Cheers
> >>         -Mike
> >>         *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management
> >> policy           *
> >>         _______________________________________________
> >>         sig-policy mailing list
> >>         sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
> >>         https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >> <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> >> *
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     sig-policy mailing list
> >>     sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
> >>     https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >> <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> >> *
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sig-policy mailing list
> >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Yuya KAWAKAMI
> > JPNAP Network/Software Engineer
> > Internet Multifeed Co.
> > +81-3-6262-0960
> > kawak...@mfeed.ad.jp
> >
> >
> > *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
> > *
> > _______________________________________________
> > sig-policy mailing list
> > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>



-- 
Thanks and Regards
Nitin Sharma
Mobile No: 9968693424
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to