[image: image.png]
×

This is what APNIC got from the recovered pool yesterday. This will serve 2
members on the waiting list since Jan 2017. After that, the waiting list
will be of 426 members. We need something close to /13 (or /14+/15+/16) to
clear the existing waiting list (assuming that all members are requesting
for /22)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 at 17:16 藤崎智宏 <fujis...@syce.net> wrote:

> Dear policy sig colleagues,
>
> I got a clarification question from APNIC secretariat about waiting
> list management.
> Let me share my answer for that question.
>
> Q:
> Currently, we still have IPv4 addresses available in the 103/8 pool,
> so when NEW members
> apply for IPv4 delegation, they always first receive from the 103/8
> pool, before they receive
> delegation from the non-103/8 pool. However, after the 103/8 pool
> exhaustion, it is possible
> there are IPv4 addresses available in the non-103/8 but not in 103/8 pool.
>
> In this case, should new members be able to first receive delegations
> from the non-103/8 pool without wait listed for 103/8 pool?
>
> A:
> With my current proposal, approved new member requests up to /22 will
> be placed on
> 103/8 pool waiting list and approved addition amount (maximum /22)
> will be placed on
>  non-103/8 pool waiting list.
>
> If there are other questions or comments, please let me know.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Yours Sincerely,
> ---
> Tomohiro Fujisaki
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
-- 
Best Wishes,

Aftab A. Siddiqui
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to