“Or.. Just get over with it :)” +1 I think spending time and effort on IPv4 policy is just purposeless. Realistically, the people who are commercially wedded to that platform will do whatever it takes to keep afloat for as long as they can. Trying to make IPv4 Policy ‘work right’ will be like playing “Whack-a-Mole” as the desperate players display every bit of ingenuity and rat cunning they possess to stay in the game, until their business model eventually becomes untenable.
Regards Mike From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Aftab Siddiqui Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2016 12:55 p.m. To: Yuya KAWAKAMI; sig-policy@lists.apnic.net Subject: Re: [sig-policy] New Policy Proposal prop-116: Prohibit to transfer IPv4 addresses in the final /8 block prop-116 is similar to prop-106 with few cosmetic changes so it would be good to review the old discussion. I wonder if there can be better way to prevent such kind of transfer. Yes, there is a better way, scrap prop-105 and stop handing over additional /22 for no reason and add the recovered resources to final /8 pool. Or.. Just get over with it :) -- Best Wishes, Aftab A. Siddiqui The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
