Dear Colleagues, I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 31st Jan to discuss these proposals. Many supporting comment expressed on this proposal. Japanese community support prop-120. Best Regards, Satoru Tsurumaki JPOPF-ST 2018-01-30 6:34 GMT+09:00 Bertrand Cherrier <b.cherr...@micrologic.nc>: > Dear SIG members > > A new version of the proposal "prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan" > has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. > > Information about earlier versions is available from: > > https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-120/ > > You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal: > > - Do you support or oppose the proposal? > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective? > > Please find the text of the proposal below. > > Kind Regards, > > Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > prop-120-v002: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki > fujisaki at syce dot net > > > 1. Problem statement > -------------------- > > APNIC makes IPv4 address delegation from two IPv4 pools. These are the > 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool. > > Currently, there are no IPv4 addresses in the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered > pool and APNIC manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved > requests. And, based on the Geoff's projection (*1), the 103/8 (Final > /8) pool will be exhausted in a few years. > > It will be necessary to make a guidance about how to manage the IPv4 > delegation after both IPv4 pools exhaustion. > > > 2. Objective of policy change > ----------------------------- > > To provide a guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion. > > > 3. Situation in other regions > ----------------------------- > > None. > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > Guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion: > > - The first time an approved request cannot be fulfilled from the 103/8 > pool, a waiting list will be created. That waiting list will be > managed same as recovered pool waiting list. > > - APNIC continue to manage two pools, the recovered pool and the 103/8 > pool. > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > ----------------------------- > > Advantages: > > - Possible to avoid confusion at 103/8 address pool exhaustion date > > Disadvantages: > > None. > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > ------------------------------ > > No impact to resource holders. > > > 7. References > ------------- > 1. IPv4 Address Report > http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ > > Cordialement, > ___________________________________________ > Bertrand Cherrier > Administration Systèmes - R&D > Micro Logic Systems > b.cherr...@micrologic.nc > https://www.mls.nc > Tél : +687 24 99 24 > VoIP : 65 24 99 24 > SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min) > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
