Hi Satoru,
Thanks for investing time in the several policy proposals.
I think that the last couple of emails could help all you to better understand
the problem.
Clearly, if different people read the current policy text in a different way,
it will be much better to find a way so we have a
sts.apnic.net
on behalf of Owen DeLong
Sent: Saturday, 24 August 2019 12:45 AM
To: Simon Sohel Baroi / Global Business / 01847102243 /
Cc: Sumon Ahmed Sabir ; Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
I think the current text isn’t really a
Hi Owen, all,
Sorry the late answer … been too busy the last weeks.
Responses below, in-line.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 27/8/19 8:05, "Owen DeLong" escribió:
On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:19 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
Hi Javed,
I think you’re getting
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-124,based
on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many participants expressed a neutral for the proposal with reasons
that the
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2019 6:19 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi Javed,
I think you’re getting something wrong
...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Owen DeLong
Sent: Saturday, 24 August 2019 12:45 AM
To: Simon Sohel Baroi / Global Business / 01847102243 /
Cc: Sumon Ahmed Sabir ; Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-124-v006: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
I think the current text isn’t really a problem
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:19 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> wrote:
>
> Hi Javed,
>
> I think you’re getting something wrong.
>
> Policies aren’t there so APNIC can verify “everything” to “every” member.
> This will be impossible.
>
> Policies are there so everybody know the rules, and try
Hi Javed,
I think you’re getting something wrong.
Policies aren’t there so APNIC can verify “everything” to “every” member. This
will be impossible.
Policies are there so everybody know the rules, and try their best to avoid
breaking them.
Policies are there to avoid
I think the current text isn’t really a problem because reasonable people apply
a reasonable interpretation of intent rather than the literal meaning.
The proposal brings literal meaning more in line with well understood intent.
While I don’t believe there is an actual problem to solve here,
Dear Sir,
Also, Requesting to the Author to represent the Proposal with Example and
Graphical Representation.
The example should have comparison with Present situation and the Propose
Solution of the problem.
- with regards
SIMON.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 8:33 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote:
>
I do not support this proposal. Intention is good but no one is really
concerned nor can verify this in practice. I think the current policy text is
good.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed
11 matches
Mail list logo
