Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Doc
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Alexander Boulgakov wrote: > What about the Adaptec 1460. People on USENET and on the PCMCIA site say > it works, and it is only $99 (as opposed to $199 for the 1480). I does > not have CardBus, but ruther PCMCIA type II. This probably means 16 bit > transfers. Can this handl

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Doug McLaren
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 08:47:35PM -0500, Alexander Boulgakov wrote: | I have an older laptop, only USB (1.1 only I think, but I heard USB2.0 | is backwards compatible) and PCMCIA ports avalable. I want to get a CD | burner, and, as far as I can tell, PCMCIA doesn't provide enough bus | bandwi

Re: [Siglinux] Dual boot system with two harddrives

2002-08-26 Thread Chris
Sorry for the confusion. To clarify, I meant that usually, only one MBR _is written to_ on a machine. That being the first device the system BIOS recognizes. In Michael's case (I'm assuming here, but from what he said i believe to be true), "/dev/hda" (AKA MBR of primary master IDE) is setup t

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Alexander Boulgakov
What about the Adaptec 1460. People on USENET and on the PCMCIA site say it works, and it is only $99 (as opposed to $199 for the 1480). I does not have CardBus, but ruther PCMCIA type II. This probably means 16 bit transfers. Can this handle a 1x or 2x burner reliably? Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Siglinux] Dual boot system with two harddrives

2002-08-26 Thread Doc Shipley
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Chris wrote: > Important thing to remember is that there is usually only one MBR on a machine. > If you have a SCSI and IDE mix, it'll setup to the IDE before SCSI Um, this is very badly stated. There is one MBR per hard drive. Period. Some motherboards will automatical

Re: [Siglinux] Dual boot system with two harddrives

2002-08-26 Thread Chris
Important thing to remember is that there is usually only one MBR on a machine. If you have a SCSI and IDE mix, it'll setup to the IDE before SCSI Currently, I have a SCSI drive for Linux and an IDE drive for Windows98 I've been bitten by this in the past. This is what i've done and haven't had

Re: [Siglinux] Dual boot system with two harddrives

2002-08-26 Thread patricklang
Windows 2k and XP have significant improvements in the boot procedure. They still clobber the MBR as Wei-shi mentioned, but they -will- run happily off the second hard drive. My desktop used to have 2 hard drives, with Windows XP on primary-master, another XP install and linux on the secondar

Re: [Siglinux] Dual boot system with two harddrives

2002-08-26 Thread Wei-shi Tsai
I might not be the best person to answer this question, but I'll see what I can do. (I have a Windows 2000/Linux setup on one drive). If anyone else on the list finds problems, feel free to tell me and the list. Everytime you install Linux and a Windows operating system, you always install t

[Siglinux] Dual boot system with two harddrives

2002-08-26 Thread Michael Yuan
Hi guys, I have not used windows for years. But recently a project I am working on requires some tools that are only available under windows xp. So, I need to put in a second harddrive (I want it to be a slave on the first IDE bus) in my system and try to install windows xp on it. I hate this. B

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Alexander Boulgakov
Interesting idea. I do not have access to a desktop, but all I really need is a backup medium. Perhaps I should look into other things (tape drives?). What do you guys use for computer backups? Preferably cheap. CD burning attracts me because a) CD-R are dirt cheap b) Most other computers have

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Alexander Boulgakov
What about a direct CardBus CD burner? Searching the web now. Alex Alexander Boulgakov wrote: > Ahem. $199 for the Adaptec 1480, plus ~100-150 for an external scsi. > This is kind of steep. Any other suggestions? (Pinch a penny till the > buffalo farts...) OTOH, "you get what you pay for." Per

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Alexander Boulgakov
Ahem. $199 for the Adaptec 1480, plus ~100-150 for an external scsi. This is kind of steep. Any other suggestions? (Pinch a penny till the buffalo farts...) OTOH, "you get what you pay for." Perhaps this is a good investments after all. Thanks! Alex Patrick Lang wrote: > Any Teac or Plextor w

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Patrick Lang
Any Teac or Plextor would be great. Hypermicro.com has all the goods, they specialize in highend storage and have good prices. SCSI's expensive but it won't ever let you down ;) Also, I don't know about firewire cdrw's in linux, but they've been reliable on Macs from what I've heard. I think t

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread Alexander Boulgakov
Fine. So Adaptec 1480 is a CardBus<->SCSI adapter. Which SCSI burner do you recommend to go along with that? Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Get a cardbus SCSI card and external burner if you want reliability. Just my > 2c... > > I recently sold my 16x ide burner and went back to my SCSI 6x

Re: [Siglinux] USB Burner

2002-08-26 Thread patricklang
Get a cardbus SCSI card and external burner if you want reliability. Just my 2c... I recently sold my 16x ide burner and went back to my SCSI 6x burner, it writes better and more reliably with audio. Its not exactly the cheapest, Adaptec 1480's run $120+, but they do work with Linux. Patric