Re: [Siglinux] Another groups disscussion. [SDonie@lgc.com: RE: [AustinJUG] Sharing keybuffers over computers.... Possible?]

2004-01-16 Thread Daniel Brown
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:12:57AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Daniel Brown wrote: > > >But won't the users all be sharing the same cursor? I think Mike is > >looking for independent, simultaneous editing by multiple clients, IIUC. > > > >danb > > > > > Now we're getting into a terribly diffi

Re: [Siglinux] Another groups disscussion. [SDonie@lgc.com: RE: [AustinJUG] Sharing keybuffers over computers.... Possible?]

2004-01-16 Thread Anthony Liguori
Daniel Brown wrote: But won't the users all be sharing the same cursor? I think Mike is looking for independent, simultaneous editing by multiple clients, IIUC. danb Now we're getting into a terribly difficult programming problem. How does one regulate two clients simultaneously editing the s

[Siglinux] Fwd: [ctl-ctlug] Spring 2004 GNU/Linux/OpenSource Fest

2004-01-16 Thread Jeff Strunk
This looks like fun. --Jeff -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [ctl-ctlug] Spring 2004 GNU/Linux/OpenSource Fest Date: Friday 16 January 2004 02:06 From: Chuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello fellow Linux lovers (OK, and you BSD folks too), My name is Chuck Tetlow and I've recently bee

Re: [Siglinux] Another groups disscussion. [SDonie@lgc.com: RE: [AustinJUG] Sharing keybuffers over computers.... Possible?]

2004-01-16 Thread chris
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:00:18AM -0600, Big Mike Forsberg wrote: > Yeah, that's what I'm looking for. I think it'd be great in the labs > since all the computers are so close. i was going to suggest screen too since i think it comes closest to shared buffer/keyboard of any apps i'm aware of, b

Re: [Siglinux] Another groups disscussion. [SDonie@lgc.com: RE: [AustinJUG] Sharing keybuffers over computers.... Possible?]

2004-01-16 Thread Big Mike Forsberg
Yeah, that's what I'm looking for. I think it'd be great in the labs since all the computers are so close. Big Mike P.S. How does one end a senetence like above without ending with for. Since it's a prepasistion and all. On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:30:06PM -0600, Daniel Brown wrote: > But won't