Paul Sack wrote:
Today at 11:52am, Alexander Boulgakov expounded:
++ To clarify my situation:
++ The whole building is an ethernet based sub-net (mask
++ 255.255.255.128 I think). The only box connected to both the intranet
++ and the internet is this pos called rockbox (ip 66.112.238.1 I thi
Today at 11:52am, Alexander Boulgakov expounded:
++ To clarify my situation:
++ The whole building is an ethernet based sub-net (mask
++ 255.255.255.128 I think). The only box connected to both the intranet
++ and the internet is this pos called rockbox (ip 66.112.238.1 I think -
++ crackers w
Paul Sack wrote:
Today at 11:19am, Alexander Boulgakov expounded:
++ However, I was thinking if there was a way for my ethernet card to
++ capture his frames, and forward them through the proxy to the outside
++ world, thus bypassing the necessity of having his computer logged in to
++ the proxy
Today at 11:19am, Alexander Boulgakov expounded:
++ However, I was thinking if there was a way for my ethernet card to
++ capture his frames, and forward them through the proxy to the outside
++ world, thus bypassing the necessity of having his computer logged in to
++ the proxy (we cant log in th
