Hi,
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:57:13PM +1000, Sean Burford wrote:
> Thanks. I think I've addressed all of your points.
Great, thanks a lot! All 3 patches are merged.
Added one more minor change, the bitwidth_ms option values are now
integers instead of strings.
Cheers, Uwe.
--
http://hermann
Hi,
Thanks. I think I've addressed all of your points.
The only style point I really disagree with is using an instance variable
for the samplenum, but we're not multithreaded so that should be fine.
I'm not exactly sure how you would like the dump directory structure to
look so I gave it a goo
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:51:37AM +1000, Sean Burford wrote:
> I've put together a basic Wiegand decoder that extracts bit streams from
> wiegand signals. It stops at the binary level and doesn't extract facility
> codes/identity numbers etc. This is on the list of possible future
> decoder
Hi,
I've put together a basic Wiegand decoder that extracts bit streams from
wiegand signals. It stops at the binary level and doesn't extract facility
codes/identity numbers etc. This is on the list of possible future
decoders at
https://sigrok.org/wiki/Protocol_decoders#Possible_candidates_for
4 matches
Mail list logo
