And Pear Cable withdrew...
FLASH: BLAKE WITHDRAWS [image:
Print]http://www.randi.org/joom/index2.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=102pop=1page=0Itemid=27
[image:
E-mail]http://www.randi.org/joom/index2.php?option=com_contenttask=emailformid=102itemid=27
Written by Jeff Wagg
We've just
On 10/2/07, Gautam John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Randi Offers $1 Million If Audiophiles Can Prove $7250 Speaker
Cables Are Better
$7250 buys a lot of weed - the effects are better I am told.
Cheeni
That's one of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. But can
weeders afford it?
Adit.
On 10/3/07, Srini Ramakrishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$7250 buys a lot of weed - the effects are better I am told.
Cheeni
James Randi Offers $1 Million If Audiophiles Can Prove $7250 Speaker
Cables Are Better
Our rant about those $7,250 Pear Anjou speaker cables found its way to
the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), and Randi offered $1
million to anyone who can prove those cables are any better than
Thank you.
That said, I'd like to believe my audiophile abilities do not merit
speakers priced over Rs 5000. I have a 2.1 Mercury set here that goes
into paranormal spasms moments before each phone call. I'd like a set
that can remain stoic, but a $1000 replacement is unthinkable. What
On 02-Oct-07, at 3:10 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Keep your phone away from your speakers?
The laptop's inbuilt speakers have no such problem, so it's clearly
an issue with the shielding. (Speakers are borrowed; not mine.)
I have a Creative 2.1, havent had any sound shielding issues with it,
i have 2 mobile phones, a TDMA router and a shortwave radio in the
same room.
On 10/2/07, Kiran Jonnalagadda wrote:
That said, I'd like to believe my audiophile abilities do not merit
speakers priced over Rs 5000. I have
