Hey Jess, nice to see you around after ages! I hope the bullet got you
in the shoulder, not the heart! ;-)
Deepa.
On 7/6/07, Jessica Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deepa,
I check silk mail after ages..and this is the first one I see :/
As of now I have no satisfying answer. .. Yahoo is
On 06/07/07, Deepa Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more and more spam, and if not for the fact that I use it for many
purposes, I would shut it (I combined those two words while typing,
and typed another word, oops,Freudian slip!) down...
Suggestion: Why not use Yahoo's Forward all email
At 2007-07-06 09:38:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why is Gmail so much better on the spam scenario?
On a related note, here's a paper titled Sender Reputation in a Large
Webmail Service by someone at Google. http://www.ceas.cc/2006/19.pdf
My opinion is that Yahoo engineers have the
Binand Sethumadhavan wrote: [ on 01:08 PM 7/6/2007 ]
Policies I guess... My opinion is that Yahoo engineers have the spam
problem solved to the extend Google has, but the higher ups are
reluctant to deploy these solutions.
I thought (back when I was using Yahoo mail regularly - upto around
On Jul 6, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
Binand Sethumadhavan wrote: [ on 01:08 PM 7/6/2007 ]
Policies I guess... My opinion is that Yahoo engineers have the spam
problem solved to the extend Google has, but the higher ups are
reluctant to deploy these solutions.
I thought (back
On 7/6/07, Madhu Menon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why a message saying find a fuckbuddy tonight makes
it past a spam filter, I will never understand.
For some of us, that's email from our friends, not spam...
-- Charles
I am still ignorant of what actually *happens* (or ought to happen)
when I send tick that box, marking messages as spam. Does the software
mark down the IP address of the sending computer? Does it mark the
words in the subject title for future reference? What else is it
supposed to do? And if it
On 7/6/07, Deepa Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still ignorant of what actually *happens* (or ought to happen)
when I send tick that box, marking messages as spam. Does the software
mark down the IP address of the sending computer? Does it mark the
words in the subject title for future
Blogger in Upper Turkfakistan has Absolutely No Opinion on the iPhone.
He was of course arrested shortly afterwards. Interrogations so far have
failed to determine the reasons for his refusal to write about the popular
product. Ahmed can now be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He seemed unaware of
Deepa Mohan [06/07/07 11:50 +0430]:
Since I am not a techie, I want to know, especially with reference to
Yahoo...what happens when I mark something on my inbox as spam? I get
a standard thank you saying that it helps every time I identify
something as spam...but of late, I notice that my Yahoo
Abhijit Menon-Sen [06/07/07 13:13 +0530]:
And why is Gmail so much better on the spam scenario?
On a related note, here's a paper titled Sender Reputation in a Large
Webmail Service by someone at Google. http://www.ceas.cc/2006/19.pdf
Yup. That's a great paper to read, and pretty close to
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 02:37:58AM -0700, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Given what I know of the people running yahoo email - they do have a very
high awareness of it. Large ISP / email provider filtering doesnt work the
same way as at small linux box run by a geek type domains.
Which is why
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:36:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Yeah, and several of them suck bad at spam filtering even though they
dont know they suck that bad.
I agree that they suck. Spamassassin can't compete with the number
of measurement points and aggregated human
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Which is why they suck so badly.
My point of view that there should be one VServer/customer,
with static IP and full postfix/procmail/spam/antivirus/webmail
mounty, if that's what the customer wants.
several-middle-linux-boxes-run-by-a-geek-ly Yrs,
Yeah, and several
On Friday 06 Jul 2007 2:21 pm, Deepa Mohan wrote:
I am still ignorant of what actually *happens* (or ought to happen)
when I send tick that box, marking messages as spam. Does the software
mark down the IP address of the sending computer? Does it mark the
words in the subject title for future
On 7/6/07, Ved Prakash Vipul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure relative competencies (gmail vs yahoo) play a big role, but
yahoo has a larger attack surface - they have been around much
longer and hence spammers have more target addresses @yahoo
and are also more familiar with their AS
Iowa who live 20 miles from the main road are never going to be
served by a Postbus or train. Their kids commute 50 miles to high
school.
Why are urban areas surrounded with a halo of suburbia, and no
commute infrastructure there, though. There are certainly no
reasons by
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:15:12AM -0700, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
Because there's a subspecies that doesn't like neighbors and has delusions
of privacy grandeur. Being rich enough to own land has also meant
being rich enough to control one's own commute, at least until now.
If land ownership
This is an interesting piece doing the rounds on http://del.icio.us
http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2007/07/a_cyclic_universe.php
Venkat
On 7/6/07, Venkat Mangudi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting piece doing the rounds on http://del.icio.us
http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2007/07/a_cyclic_universe.php
The Bad Astronomy piece on this is also good reading:
#inherits previous disclaimers
There's a paper floating around (can't get to it right now since I'm
on my BB in a beach in goa) that claims that gmail users are smarter
and wealthier than yahoo or hotmail users.
This could be because the gmail userbase hasn't trickled down to the
unwashed
21 matches
Mail list logo
