On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sumant Srivathsan suma...@gmail.comwrote:
Mahesh (the restaurant) is one of my favourite places in Mumbai. I'm
game.
7:30-ish on Wednesday?
Really? I can only assume you haven't been there in a while. The Lonely
Planet curse had struck with a vengeance.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ingrid ingrid.srin...@gmail.com wrote:
Juhu Mahesh?
Gajalee JVPD?
http://www.gajalee.com/rest_juhu.html
7.30 pm?
The last time I ate in Gajalee I was violently unwell, so I'll vote for
Mahesh unless Sumant is really against it.
The time works for me.
--
I'm leaving South Bombay shortly. Confirming 7.30 pm at Juhu Mahesh.
Ingrid Srinath
@ingridsrinath
On 29 May 2013 11:49, Biju Chacko biju.cha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ingrid ingrid.srin...@gmail.com wrote:
Juhu Mahesh?
Gajalee JVPD?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Ingrid ingrid.srin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm leaving South Bombay shortly. Confirming 7.30 pm at Juhu Mahesh.
See you there. I'm 9845272618 if you need to co-ordinate.
-- b
... Probably the first time a thread has drifted back...
This observation allows us to make some statements about the
dimensionality of silk thread-drift space, under the assumption it
can be modeled by brownian motion.
We know the dimensionality is strictly greater than 0 (in trivial
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Dave Long dave.l...@bluewin.ch wrote:
In order to resolve this issue, I suggest we start an infinite thread; upon
its conclusion we'll have more information to discriminate between the two
cases.
The closest approximation to infinite threads (at least on silk)
an infinite thread; upon its conclusion
Ah.
On 29 May 2013 18:39, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
The closest approximation to infinite threads (at least on silk) are
pun cascades.
Yoko. Here we go again.
Ram
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Sean Doyle sdo...@gmail.com wrote:
YOKO? You Only Know Once?
Ono! Is that what it means?
YOKO? You Only Know Once?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram r.sunda...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 May 2013 18:39, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
The closest approximation to infinite threads (at least on silk) are
pun cascades.
Yoko. Here we go again.
Ram
One must share your well-founded fears. One might go so far as to say that one
is apPauled.
On May 29, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram r.sunda...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 May 2013 18:39, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
The closest approximation to infinite threads (at least
On May 29, 2013 3:09 AM, Udhay Shankar N ud...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Dave Long dave.l...@bluewin.ch wrote:
In order to resolve this issue, I suggest we start an infinite thread;
upon
its conclusion we'll have more information to discriminate between the
two
On May 29, 2013 9:04 AM, Bonobashi bonoba...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
One must share your well-founded fears. One might go so far as to say
that one is apPauled.
Why Ring o the bells of doom?
Thaths
On May 29, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram r.sunda...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 May 2013
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 29, 2013 9:04 AM, Bonobashi bonoba...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
One must share your well-founded fears. One might go so far as to say
that one is apPauled.
Why Ring o the bells of doom?
Yeah, just let it be.
-- b
On Thursday 30 May 2013 11:08 AM, Biju Chacko wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 29, 2013 9:04 AM, Bonobashi bonoba...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
One must share your well-founded fears. One might go so far as to say
that one is apPauled.
Why Ring o the
15 matches
Mail list logo
