On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 14:40, Hariharan Rahul wrote:
> I don't have much to say about the other discussion but the article really
> got my teeth on edge, because of the tabloidy anthropomorphization of
> something much simpler - "the loss function wasn't regularized properly
> leading to
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 19:08, Thaths wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:47 AM Dave Long wrote:
>
> > > These days I think [email] is mostly used by us old fogies.
> > Fair enough, but what, pray tell, do all those non-old-fogies use to
> > convey thoughts that are too long for social media
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:47 AM Dave Long wrote:
> > These days I think [email] is mostly used by us old fogies.
> Fair enough, but what, pray tell, do all those non-old-fogies use to
> convey thoughts that are too long for social media comments and too short
> for blog posts?
>
Not being on
Dave Long wrote on 1/3/19 2:47 PM January 3, 2019:
These days I think [email] is mostly used by us old fogies.
Fair enough, but what, pray tell, do all those non-old-fogies use to convey
thoughts that are too long for social media comments and too short for blog
posts?
-Dave
They post
> These days I think [email] is mostly used by us old fogies.
Fair enough, but what, pray tell, do all those non-old-fogies use to convey
thoughts that are too long for social media comments and too short for blog
posts?
-Dave
I don't have much to say about the other discussion but the article really
got my teeth on edge, because of the tabloidy anthropomorphization of
something much simpler - "the loss function wasn't regularized properly
leading to overfitting!"
Rahul
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 9:09 PM Vinit Bhansali
