Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

That those who seek the truth are so easily duped is disheartening. It's easy for those in the know to justify no attempt at getting the word out. On Sat, May 9, 2020, 4:52 PM Nenah Sylver wrote: > Reid wrote: If they were to consider studies with subjects using > chloroquine, why not do this

RE: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

Reid wrote: If they were to consider studies with subjects using chloroquine, why not do this in malarial infested areas, where people routinely take chloroquine anyway? = Reid, I am not sure what you are asking. Chloroquine has been used--successfully, I hear--for

Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

If they were to consider studies with subjects using chloroquine, why not do this in malarial infested areas, where people routinely take chloroquine anyway? On Sat, May 9, 2020, 3:11 PM Nenah Sylver wrote: > Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the > "Coronavirus

Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

That is just chilling. And some wonder why we are feeling manipulated and why we are getting more cynical by the day because of the lies and half-truths? Thanks for postingthis, Nenah.Lola - Original Message - From: Nenah Sylver To: Nenah Sylver Sent: Sat, 09 May 2020 15:11:09 -0400

CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the "Coronavirus Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me the following review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details [were portrayed correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme (furin)