Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

I so agree sol. dee On 21 Oct 2009, at 23:13, sol wrote: Marshall Dudley wrote: I think basically an expose' on the quackbusters operation. Bolan especially can be pretty liberal with his comments using words like scum and so forth. I think basically the courts found that the use of

Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

I agree. Plus Bolan has targeted an organization which is one of the good guys, and for what reason I really don't know. He has targeted spamhaus, which for me prevents up to 10,000 spam emails a day from pharmaceutical companies selling things like viagra going into my mailbox. In fact the

RE: CSQuackbusters sue each other

@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other Marshall Dudley wrote: I think basically an expose' on the quackbusters operation. Bolan especially can be pretty liberal with his comments using words like scum and so forth. I think basically the courts found that the use

Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

Marshall Dudley wrote: I think basically an expose' on the quackbusters operation. Bolan especially can be pretty liberal with his comments using words like scum and so forth. I think basically the courts found that the use of such derogatory terms were merited by the actions of

Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

I have read some of this but get lost in legal jargon. What was the case actually *about?* I know it involved those quackbusters on the internet but what were they suing Bolen *for*? dee On 19 Oct 2009, at 21:25, Marshall Dudley wrote: This is getting funny: * FEATURE ARTICLE*

Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

They sued Bolen and Clark and others for libel for telling the truth. It was a SLAPP suit and recognized as such by the court. (that is a suit without merit which is simply filed to try to stop someone from doing something legal by harassment and costs). They ( Barrett, the Canadian Guy, and

Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

Thanks for the info Marshall, but what were they telling the truth *about*? Or has this got lost in the mists of time lol? dee On 20 Oct 2009, at 19:07, Marshall Dudley wrote: They sued Bolen and Clark and others for libel for telling the truth. It was a SLAPP suit and recognized as such

Re: CSQuackbusters sue each other

I think basically an expose' on the quackbusters operation. Bolan especially can be pretty liberal with his comments using words like scum and so forth. I think basically the courts found that the use of such derogatory terms were merited by the actions of quackbusters and associates.

CSQuackbusters sue each other

This is getting funny: * FEATURE ARTICLE* Quackbusters Sue Each Other - All is Not Well in Scumville ... http://bolenreport.com/feature_articles/feature_article079.htm Marshall -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are