Wouldn't they have been rather expensive if they had been real silver? and
*why* would they use real silver at all? The mind boggles! dee
On 25 Feb 2010, at 03:51, Jonathan B. Britten wrote:
I read her site in some detail years ago, and was impressed in particular by
one link to an
The silvergen SG7 does 5 gallon batches...in pretty short order.
The SG6 does smaller batches [one quart] and is a decent generator at a
decent price made by a decent guy, Trem.
When anyone asks about making a BUNCH of CS/EIS...that's where I send
them. www.silvergen.com
Ode
At
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Christina Mattson tinamatt...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Christina Mattson tinamatt...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: CSmachine question
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 11:17 AM
Hi Bob, I also had this dilemma a while back. I ended up going with what
you call ionic
Ions cannot exist without the water, so sizing particles made out of ions
by drying them, using an electron microscope that can only be used on dry
samples, is total BS.
Ode
###
adding: Any time you see a particle size figure at .0008 microns, it
was determined using an electron
getting better at understanding the technical stuff the more i read it.
Tina
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Dorothy Fitzpatrick d...@deetroy.org wrote:
From: Dorothy Fitzpatrick d...@deetroy.org
Subject: Re: CSmachine question
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 3:01 AM
Most
I read her site in some detail years ago, and was impressed in
particular by one link to an academic article about a Japanese many who
got argyria from consuming a popular breath mint sold here -- Jintan is
the name, sold in a few variations.
Sliver Jintan breath mints look like BB's or ball
Most on this group prefer the EIS (electronically isolated silver) commonly
known as colloidal silver (CS) ours is a mixture of both and consists of
mainly ionic with some colloidal. I have a SilverPuppy which I love--this
makes clear EIS and is cheap and easy to use. You can use it manually
william heene wrote:
Afternoon...I am new to the group and looking to buy a CS mach., at
this point I am confused about which is more effective, ionic or
particle.
For what? The ionic part is best for some things, such as burns, and
the particulate is better for others such as killing
NO CS generator using electricity and water does anything BUT produce Ions.
Ions only come in one size.. WAY small. One atom minus one electron. Any
smaller and the Silver would no longer be Silver.
Particles come later depending on conditions in the brew container
and how fast ions
the more i read it.
Tina
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Dorothy Fitzpatrick d...@deetroy.org wrote:
From: Dorothy Fitzpatrick d...@deetroy.org
Subject: Re: CSmachine question
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 3:01 AM
Most on this group prefer the EIS (electronically isolated silver
:
From: Christina Mattson tinamatt...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: CSmachine question
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 11:17 AM
Hi Bob, I also had this dilemma a while back. I ended up going with what you
call ionic (which i call CS but an going to change to EIS
tinamatt...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: CSmachine question
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 3:35 PM
Hello again bob, i was in a hurry and for got to mention that i have read
literature about Particulate vs Ionic and here's what i came up with. In my
case i was specifically
Afternoon...I am new to the group and looking to buy a CS mach., at this point
I am confused about which is more effective, ionic or particle. I can't seem
to find an answer! One site they say ionic and other site it is particle. I
assume you people are very experienced in CS producion and
13 matches
Mail list logo
