Weird. So 0.9=0.5
James-Osbourne: Holmes
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:01 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSTDS/PWT meters
That is normally called 3 1/2 digits, not 4.
Marshall
Trem wrote:
Hi
, Holmes wrote:
Weird. So 0.9=0.5
James-Osbourne: Holmes
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:01 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CSTDS/PWT meters
That is normally called 3 1/2 digits, not 4.
Marshall
The forth digit is behind the decimal point.
Hanna doesn't advertise or mention that it will read xxx.x [four digits]
and only shows or mentions readings within its specified range.
I was , uh, mistaken about the actual readout. [eyes, assumptions and
paranoia working together as a team]
a dead horse to me.
Trem
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote coyote...@earthlink.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
I'm willing, out of curiosity, to 'determine some idea' of how far off
reality is from various stated
I'm willing, out of curiosity, to 'determine some idea' of how far off
reality is from various stated views of it. [something within a range in an
infinite scale]
I've got an odd feeling that no one can say anything that's true about
anything. [Nothing that is, except, perhaps, that statement.]
Yup The real stuff with flash floods, downed trees and everthang.
But, the suns shining today! [only]...then, freeezing rain! O'boy!
All this after a mere 4 months of 99+deg muggy dry and cracked lake beds.
laundry day!
ken
At 11:01 AM 10/29/02 -0800, you wrote:
My Gawd! Rain? real
OK, on the list
Got addresses?
Ken
At 05:30 PM 10/29/02 -0800, you wrote:
Ken:
I'd love to see Stephen @ Natural Immunogenics do an analysis and a
antibacterial comparison on your best batch... I'd also like to see the
characterization done by Frances Key et al w/ silvercolloids.com
Both
Whatever the verbiage-- my PWT does not function, period. Probably the best
solution is to replace it and ashcan the present one. But where do I order a
PWT?
Bob
Hi Bob,
See http://silvergen.com/ppm.htm
Trem
- Original Message -
From: barnb...@aol.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: CSTDS/PWT meters
Whatever the verbiage-- my PWT does not function, period. Probably the best
Ode Coyote says:
snip...
The PWT actually has a 4 digit display and pegs out at 999.x uS just
before it shows a 1 in the far left saying it can't read that high or any
higher.
...snip
Ken: You actually have a Hanna PWT with a 4 digit display? The attached
PWT.JPG from the Hanna website
Attachment of PWT.jpg this time.
_
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband. Join now!
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp
attachment: pwt.jpg
Hi Jimmy Joe,
The PWT does go higher than 2 places plus the decimal. It reads up 199.9.
See my post to Ken this morning.
Trem
- Original Message -
From: J J mennj...@hotmail.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Ode
get them properly
adjusted.
This seems like beating a dead horse to me.
Trem
- Original Message -
From: Ode Coyote coyote...@earthlink.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
I'm willing, out of curiosity, to 'determine
: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Ode Coyote says:
snip...
The PWT actually has a 4 digit display and pegs out at 999.x uS just
before it shows a 1 in the far left saying it can't read that high or any
higher.
...snip
Ken: You actually have
- Original Message -
From: Dean Miller dtmil...@midiowa.net
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: CSTDS/PWT meters
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:31:25 -5, M. G. Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
wrote:
Specs for my Hanna TDS-1:
Range: 0 to 999 ppm
Resolution: 1
of your Hanna meter.
in error
Ivan.
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 6:59 a.m.
To: *Silver-List*
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Sorry Ivan
Strange mood and recent encounters with lawyer mentalities
in consumer
: Tuesday, 29 October 2002 6:59 a.m.
To: *Silver-List*
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Sorry Ivan
Strange mood and recent encounters with lawyer mentalities
in consumer
industry. [Ripped off by ommissive merchandising]
It's not me fighting you, it's commentary about how truth
can be more
I have a question...
I had one of my batches of CS do something really odd. I would like to send
a picture so everybody could see it and tell me if anyone ever had this
happen. Is it okay to send a picture here? And do I just attach the picture
to my message? Not sure on the rules and hows of
My Gawd! Rain? real rain?? I live on the north coast in an area that
normally scores 125+inches and so far we've had one light mist; fogged my
glasses, had to slow down.
Sounds like a case of Coyote Blues: My Prescription is stoke the fire and
get book of same title by Chris Moore - works for
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:31:25 -5, M. G. Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
wrote:
Specs for my Hanna TDS-1:
Range: 0 to 999 ppm
Resolution: 1 ppm
Accuracy: +/- 10 ppm
Typical EMC Deviation: +/- 1% of Full Scale
If I interpret this right, my TDS meter should read in steps of 1 ppm,
with no decimal point
Ken:
I'd love to see Stephen @ Natural Immunogenics do an analysis and a
antibacterial comparison on your best batch... I'd also like to see the
characterization done by Frances Key et al w/ silvercolloids.com
Both at least have extensive experience working with colloidal silver.
Best Regards,
Hey, stop barking! RTFM; the fact that you can find a meter that reads
over its nominal full scale - what it says on the 'range' dial that it is
competent to read at that position of the 'range' switch - has nothing to
do with lawyers or CYA. The 'range' is not the interval of values (call
Morning Ken,
Last shot at making the point, I promise.
Great Message that virtually summed up the history of the world.
For nearly every example you gave, I could think of a real world
example. Some are very interesting.
Maybe later I will have time to spin the yarn on some of
.
For the rest of your message I have no answer... it would be easier to
just duke it out... your place or mine?
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 4:52 a.m.
To: *Silver-List*
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Hanna's spec
No, not really.
They are good for what they're good for. [quantifying repeatablity]
They're just not good to fuel an arguement. :-)
But they could be cheaper.
Ken
At 05:36 PM 10/26/02 -0700, you wrote:
Sounds like I just wasted $50 on a PWT meter.
Ode Coyote coyote...@earthlink.net>
is the most accurate.
For the rest of your message I have no answer... it would be easier to
just duke it out... your place or mine?
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, 28 October 2002 4:52 a.m.
To: *Silver-List*
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
>Hanna's spec reporting is industry standard.
>Full scale and range are two different things. The range is a
>description of an interval of numbers in which the unit will perform
>within spec. Full scale (reading) is largest number within the range.
You just said that range and scale are
Both TDS meters and the PWT do the same thing the same way. Unless
colloidal particles are actually touching, or perhaps very very close
together, they won't register at all with either meter.
The best you can do is guesstimate the particulate content with a laser
pointer and add a fudge
Sounds like I just wasted $50 on a PWT meter.
Ode Coyote coyote...@earthlink.net wrote:
Both TDS meters and the PWT do the same thing the same way. Unless
colloidal particles are actually touching, or perhaps very very close
together, they won't register at all with either meter.
The best you
-Original Message-
From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coyote...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 3:55 a.m.
To: *Silver-List*
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Both TDS meters and the PWT do the same thing the same way. Unless
colloidal particles are actually touching
My understanding is that the TDS (total DISSOLVED solids) will not measure the
colloidal particles as they are suspended not DISSOLVED but will measure the
ion content. The PWT measures conductivity which would include colloids and
ions.
Regards,
Paul
kaselo...@aol.com wrote:please explain to
Paul has led you astray a bit in his answer :-)
Both the TDS (total dissolved solids) meter and the PWT (pure water
tester) are conductivity meters. The difference is in the scale and
calibration. A TDS meter is calibrated to convert the conductivity
reading (micro-Siemens uS) to reflect the
...@win.co.nz]
Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2002 3:05 p.m.
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: CSTDS/PWT meters
Paul has led you astray a bit in his answer :-)
Both the TDS (total dissolved solids) meter and the PWT (pure water
tester) are conductivity meters. The difference is in the scale
33 matches
Mail list logo
