Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Bob Eager
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 01:21:44 +0200 Johnny Billquist wrote: > On 2016-10-26 21:14, Paul Koning wrote: > > > >> On Oct 23, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bob Eager wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:07:33 -0400 > >> Paul Koning wrote: > >> >

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Johnny Billquist
On 2016-10-26 21:14, Paul Koning wrote: On Oct 23, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bob Eager wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:07:33 -0400 Paul Koning wrote: ... RT-11 is very clean. I've worked with V2A (the FB version when possible, SJ when I didn't have

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Johnny Billquist
On 2016-10-26 21:01, Paul Koning wrote: On Oct 26, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Rich Alderson wrote: From: Ray Jewhurst Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:44:05 -0400 I know that RT-11 is under license from Mentec No, you don't. Mentec has not

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Jacob Goense
Oh, and of course there is Fuzzball, the early IP/TCP and NTP testbed for the PDP-11 using RT-11 for build and boot. Later on it ran production timeservers and the first NSFNet backbone. ___ Simh mailing list Simh@trailing-edge.com

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread khandy21yo
There is the Commodore64 OS. Didn't it leave the file system stuff to the disk drive? Is XXDP source available? that would represent a very simple OS. Cp// was available for several machines, but I wouldn't want to based a new OS on it. Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A Original message

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Ethan Dicks
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:13 PM, David Holland wrote: > (Not that I can add much to the thread.) Other than the Minix, and split > I/D discussion tickled an old memory.. > > I'd say it depends on the the version of Minix. > > My Google Foo Finds these two threads

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Paul Koning
> On Oct 23, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bob Eager wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:07:33 -0400 > Paul Koning wrote: > >> ... > >> RT-11 is very clean. I've worked with V2A (the FB version when >> possible, SJ when I didn't have enough memory). They are very

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Paul Koning
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Rich Alderson > wrote: > >> From: Johnny Billquist >> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:11:05 +0200 > >> In fact, I would probably suggest Ray start with just writing some code >> to do some simple things without looking

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Rich Alderson
> From: Johnny Billquist > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:11:05 +0200 > In fact, I would probably suggest Ray start with just writing some code > to do some simple things without looking at existing code. The first > thing needed would be to just have something that can load

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Ethan Dicks
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Al Kossow wrote: > Did anyone ever port MINIX to the PDP-11? I know there's MINIX for the 68000 and SPARC (as of 2.0) and of ARM (as of 3.0), but I've never heard of MINIX for the PDP-11. Given that MINIX 1.0 will run on a 5150-type IBM PC,

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Paul Koning
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Rich Alderson > wrote: > >> From: Ray Jewhurst >> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:44:05 -0400 > >> I know that RT-11 is under license from Mentec > > No, you don't. Mentec has not existed for many years now.

Re: [Simh] RT-11 source

2016-10-26 Thread Rich Alderson
> From: Ray Jewhurst > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 10:44:05 -0400 > I know that RT-11 is under license from Mentec No, you don't. Mentec has not existed for many years now. The remains of the PDP-11 intellectual property have been in the hands of XX2247 for several years.