Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Johnny Billquist
On 2018-11-12 15:41, Paul Koning wrote: On Nov 10, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Lars Brinkhoff wrote: TECO for RT-11 and SITS. (SITS was a timesharing system for the MIT Logo PDP-11/45.) Regular TECO also exists for RT-11. Is this one better? Or just different? I looked quickly at the code, and

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Richard
In article , Paul Koning writes: > Maybe I should post it somewhere for others to play with. It's not the > best Python code, but it gets the job done. I wish I could find the GT40 > editing macros, though. github :) -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Lars Brinkhoff
Clem Cole wrote: > Also, Ward has a notice description/history of Teco in his pages: Tape > Editor and COrrector Teco was later renamed 'Text Editor', but it > started as a tape editor. Dan Murphy has a copy of his "The Beginnings of TECO" here: http://tenex.opost.com/anhc-31-4-anec.pdf

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Paul Koning
> On Nov 12, 2018, at 9:55 AM, Clem Cole wrote: > > BTW: My old friend and college, Paul Cantrell's Video Teco is still one the > best and most portable: Video Teco ManualVideo Teco Sources Speaking of portable -- as a language learning exercise I did an implementation of TECO in

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Clem Cole
BTW: My old friend and college, Paul Cantrell's Video Teco is still one the best and most portable: Video Teco Manual Video Teco Sources Also, Ward has a notice description/history of Teco in his pages: Tape Editor and

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Lars Brinkhoff
Paul Koning wrote: >> TECO for RT-11 and SITS. > Regular TECO also exists for RT-11. Is this one better? Or just > different? I don't know. I'm not much of an RT-11 user, or TECO user. I just found the source file lying around and wanted to pass it on. It was most likely written and cross

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-12 Thread Paul Koning
> On Nov 10, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Lars Brinkhoff wrote: > > TECO for RT-11 and SITS. (SITS was a timesharing system for the MIT > Logo PDP-11/45.) Regular TECO also exists for RT-11. Is this one better? Or just different? paul ___ Simh

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-10 Thread Lars Brinkhoff
Rhialto wrote: >> https://github.com/PDP-10/its-vault/blob/master/files/rjl/tinte.507 > This can *almost* be assembled with MACRO-11 from > https://gitlab.com/Rhialto/macro11/. Interesting. I don't have RT-11 readily available, so I'm curious to hear if anyone get it working. (I don't expect

Re: [Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-10 Thread Rhialto
On Sat 10 Nov 2018 at 13:12:20 +, Lars Brinkhoff wrote: > TECO for RT-11 and SITS. (SITS was a timesharing system for the MIT > Logo PDP-11/45.) > > https://github.com/PDP-10/its-vault/blob/master/files/rjl/tinte.507 This can *almost* be assembled with MACRO-11 from

[Simh] TINTE is not TECO either

2018-11-10 Thread Lars Brinkhoff
TECO for RT-11 and SITS. (SITS was a timesharing system for the MIT Logo PDP-11/45.) https://github.com/PDP-10/its-vault/blob/master/files/rjl/tinte.507 Les Earnest wrote: > This is a text editor written in PALX (somewhat like macro-11, but > requires some editing to be assemblable by macro --