One of the recent discussions on this list mentioned ZK3
I remember it also appeared in numerous DEC publications, with e-mail addresses
@zk3.digital.com, and, I think, in some DEC documentation (though I may be
wrong on that point)
What exactly was ZK3 ? I'm gathering it was possibly a
So now that Alan has TPC working, where and how do we document all this, i.e.
the symptoms, the underlying SIMH design behavior vs the expected RSX
behavior that cause it to manifest itself as a problem, and the DEP TS TIME
solution, in an easy-to-find way so the next person doesn't have to go
I actually find it interesting how much it reveals about the target e-mail and
account configuration
We know he's running VMS
We know he has a disk called $DISK3:
We know his user space is under $DISK3:[MARK]
And we know we've successfully filled his disk, thus denying some level of
service and
Surely it is possible to extract files from SETUP.MSI without running the
installer. Someone must have the tools to do this (either commercial or
freeware perhaps ?).
Another alternative is to run a virtual Windows OS image inside something like
VirtualBox, thus avoiding any problems
Dying RFxx disks might be due to failure of FLASH memory in the controllers
(either onboard the CPU or external chips). The charge in the memory cells in
FLASH memory chips doesn't last forever, and slowly bleeds away. Early devices
could fail after 10 years. Newer FLASH parts are better,
Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>DEC's DECserver, Xyplex Maxserver, Annex terminal servers, and Xylogics (for
>the ones I have touched and remember) all converted telnet into
> real RS/EIA-232 lines. (telnet client -> host serial, or serial terminal ->
> host telnet server)
Rich Alderson wrote:
>DECNET is available under RSX-11M and RSTS/E on PDP-11s, Tops-10 and TOPS-20
>on PDP-10s, and under VMS (and possibly Ultrix, I don't remember for certain)
>on VAXen, and on VMS follow-on systems. It is as far as possible agnostic
>about what kind of system it was running
Out of curiosity, I did a bit of Googling, and found a link to the following
Digital Technical Journal article from 1992 that explains GEM in detail. It
also gives the biographies of a number of the key players involved with GEM – I
wonder how many Clem still has sitting in his office these
On the topic of Configuring DMC11 Devices, while discussing wait delays Mark
Pizzolato recently wrote:
> Sounds reasonable. I've got to see if I can find the reason the delay was
> initially added and make sure a change like this is compatible.
What is the "SIMH strategy" for documenting such
On 2/9/16 11:41 PM, Zachary Kline wrote:
> This is around 50% humorous, but it’s still a thing I’ve been thinking about
> lately. From a newbie’s perspective, all SIMH machines are very similar. The
> worst thing about emulation is that the “feel,” of the original hardware
> doesn’t seem to be
Al Kossow wrote:
> here is the SPD
>
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/info/SP1418/SP1418PF.PDF
And the second page of the SPD even mentions "On-line Debugging Technique
(ODT)" - the topic of one of our other recent SIMH mailing list threads !!!
___
Simh
Let's move this to a new thread subject of its own !
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 12:04 PM, Davis Johnson wrote
(under old subject Re: [Simh] Interdata OS/32: hello-world in CAL32) :
> One that I remember was TI had a 9900 cross assembler written in FORTRAN (all
> caps in
s not the version
> required to compile CP/M 2.2 or 3.0. It works well, but lacks support for
> external definitions and some PLM constructs, as required by the DR source.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Clem Cole <cl...@ccc.com> wrote:
below
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:31 AM,
Sorry for this off-topic posting, but with all the recent talk about Intel's
history of x86 development, I was wondering whether there are any "Intel
connected" people around here who might know what happened to the source code
for Intel's PL/M-86, ASM86 and iAPX-86 Utilities (LINK86, LOC86,
On Feb 23, 2016, an anonymous user (li...@openmailbox.org) wrote:
> Thanks very much for the additional info. Your post was very timely since I
> read in the notes that come with the PL/M cross compiler
> that is being discussed that it was a cross-compiler hosted on MTS and VM/CMS.
> I don't
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 12:23 PM Kevin Handy wrote:
> Nowodays, many people haven't even heard a dot-matrix printer grinding away,
> let alone the huge mass of fans that seemed to make up most of an 11/70.
> Daisy weel printers are also extremely rare now. Line printers (drum, chain,
>
16 matches
Mail list logo