On 16-Mar-17 15:02, Seth Morabito wrote:
> [I seem to have missed the original message from Bob, so replying
> via Johnny's message.]
>
> On 2017-03-12 22:51, Bob Supnik wrote:
>> In general, I am no longer a fan of "approximate" simulations. If you
>> just use the spec and ignore the
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Seth Morabito wrote:
>
> ... but I
> am seeing results that lead me to believe the manual is incorrect, or
> more likely incomplete. (The manual, after all, is targeted at people
> trying to write software for the WE32100, not people trying
[I seem to have missed the original message from Bob, so replying
via Johnny's message.]
On 2017-03-12 22:51, Bob Supnik wrote:
>In general, I am no longer a fan of "approximate" simulations. If you
>just use the spec and ignore the implementation, then even if some
>particular test case (VMS
On 2017-03-12 22:51, Bob Supnik wrote:
Well, I didn't have to ask for it, because I had it... ;) Without it,
though, I could not have gotten the minute differences between the J-11
and the other PDP-11s correct.
I know... :-)
In general, I am no longer a fan of "approximate" simulations. If
Well, I didn't have to ask for it, because I had it... ;) Without it,
though, I could not have gotten the minute differences between the J-11
and the other PDP-11s correct.
In general, I am no longer a fan of "approximate" simulations. If you
just use the spec and ignore the implementation,