On 10/07/2010 05:42 PM, Sorrell, Al wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>
>> At this point, it seems quite likely that the new syntax will be
>> identical to Perl named match variables $+{name} (if I am not mistaken,
>> Perl supports them since version 5.10).
>
> Would this require Perl 5.10 to
>-Original Message-
>At this point, it seems quite likely that the new syntax will be
>identical to Perl named match variables $+{name} (if I am not mistaken,
>Perl supports them since version 5.10).
Would this require Perl 5.10 to run SEC or are you just using the same syntax
conventi
On 10/06/2010 11:27 PM, Mark D. Nagel wrote:
> On 10/4/2010 5:37 AM, Risto Vaarandi wrote:
>> I think I've found a way to create named match variables which complies
>> with Perl syntax, and does not create clashes with existing naming
>> schemes. I'll only need to experiment with it a bit :)
>>
