Risto,
The example worked perfectly. Thankyou very much for all of your
responses.
/r
Vernon Nelson
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Risto Vaarandi risto.vaara...@gmail.comwrote:
...final notes -- since the original event from the trap log is not
passed to any further rules, you can
...final notes -- since the original event from the trap log is not passed
to any further rules, you can safely remove continue=takenext from the
SingleWith2Thresholds rule.
Also, if you want to have different texts for the 1st alarm and reissued
alarms, you can take the 'action' field from the
ALCON,
I have been trying to meet some criteria for about a week now and I
cannot seem to nail it. I am trying to meet the following requirements for
matching a Juniper Netscreen trap for cpu utilization. However, I cannot
get it just right. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
In message
CAP=bk28qn5m4j9nnbdjokkbvdt3xrz7rpugxjtphloyv3g+...@mail.gmail.com ,
Vernon Nelson writes:
I have been trying to meet some criteria for about a week now and I
cannot seem to nail it. I am trying to meet the following requirements for
matching a Juniper Netscreen trap for cpu
-evcorr-users] trap suppression and threshold
ALCON,
I have been trying to meet some criteria for about a week now and I
cannot seem to nail it. I am trying to meet the following requirements for
matching a Juniper Netscreen trap for cpu utilization. However, I cannot
get it just right
I will give the contexts another try it will take me a little to test
them.. but so far it looks promising
--
Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo
