Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] Duplicate suppression and rearming

2023-03-14 Thread Eric V. Smith via Simple-evcorr-users
Risto: You (and sec) really are a treasure. Thanks for all you do. I don't currently have the issue that Mugugno mentions, but I might in the future. Your explanation below is excellent. Eric On 3/14/2023 11:52 AM, Risto Vaarandi wrote: hi Mugugno, thanks for clarifying your scenario!

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] systemd unit.service file

2016-05-08 Thread Eric V. Smith
[Oops, I meant to send this to the list. Stuart reports that it fixed his problem.] On 5/8/2016 9:47 AM, Stuart Kendrick wrote: > Anyone willing to share their system unit file? Mine looks similar, except I run with --nodetach, while you have --detach. Eric.

[Simple-evcorr-users] systemd and multiple instances of sec

2014-09-16 Thread Eric V. Smith
I run multiple copies of sec in order to independently monitor multiple log files. I'm moving to Fedora 20, and I'd like to run sec from systemd instead of using init.d shell scripts. Fedora (and all other distros I've seen) provide a sample sec.service file that just runs a single instance of

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] Pattern matching in SEC

2013-06-04 Thread Eric V. Smith
On 06/04/2013 08:37 AM, termo meter wrote: Dear All, I have question on how SEC doing pattern matching. For example i have below logs from my firewall: 5-23-2013 4:10:03 PM UDP Traffic Received from 10.1.1.1: 163May 23 2011 15:59:45: %ASA-3-10614: Deny inbound icmp src

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] Pattern matching in SEC

2013-06-04 Thread Eric V. Smith
To: simple-evcorr-users@lists.sourceforge.net, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com Date: Tuesday, 4 June, 2013, 6:42 AM Hi Eric, Thank you, i edit a bit the pattern, like this Deny\s\S+ icmp\s\S+ outside:10\.10\.0\.63 it works --- On *Tue, 4/6/13

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] extending output types (RabbitMQ)

2013-02-21 Thread Eric V. Smith
Sorry for the late reply. When I originally mentioned amqp it was to support the idea that a persistent connection to a single process would solve most use cases. And further, there's no need to build in to sec any sort of load balancing across multiple instances of such connections. Instead, the

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] How to force SEC not to process a file from start when it is being edited.

2011-10-19 Thread Eric V. Smith
Even if it were possible to delete say 100 bytes from the front of the file, how would SEC know that it needed to skip back 100 bytes to keep it's concept of the current location in the file? Imagine a scenario with multiple write to the end of the file, some of which SEC has processed, but some