Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-03 Thread Risto Vaarandi
2015-04-03 3:57 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm: On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: 2015-04-02 1:22 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: hi David, is my understanding correct that you would like to have pre_restart event, in order

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-03 Thread David Lang
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: 2015-04-03 3:57 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm: On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: 2015-04-02 1:22 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: hi David, is my understanding correct that you would

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-03 Thread Risto Vaarandi
2015-04-03 11:56 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm That's all well and good, but why do you loose more state when you do a HUP than when you do a full shutdown? I'm not even talking about restoring state after the HUP, I'm talking about the ability to output running counters. If I have a

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-02 Thread David Lang
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: 2015-04-02 1:22 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: hi David, is my understanding correct that you would like to have pre_restart event, in order to execute the following steps: 1) when HUP is received,

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-02 Thread Risto Vaarandi
2015-04-02 1:22 GMT+03:00 David Lang da...@lang.hm: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: hi David, is my understanding correct that you would like to have pre_restart event, in order to execute the following steps: 1) when HUP is received, match pre_restart synthetic event and save

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-01 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, John P. Rouillard wrote: Hi David: In message alpine.deb.2.02.1503311452250.26...@nftneq.ynat.uz, David Lang writes: before I realized that I really only needed USR2, I was sending sec a HUP to get it to close all it's output files (for log rotation), but I was running

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-01 Thread Risto Vaarandi
hi David, is my understanding correct that you would like to have pre_restart event, in order to execute the following steps: 1) when HUP is received, match pre_restart synthetic event and save event correlation state to disk, 2) let the HUP handling procedure to drop all event correlation state

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-04-01 Thread David Lang
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Risto Vaarandi wrote: hi David, is my understanding correct that you would like to have pre_restart event, in order to execute the following steps: 1) when HUP is received, match pre_restart synthetic event and save event correlation state to disk, 2) let the HUP

Re: [Simple-evcorr-users] intstates and HUP

2015-03-31 Thread John P. Rouillard
Hi David: In message alpine.deb.2.02.1503311452250.26...@nftneq.ynat.uz, David Lang writes: before I realized that I really only needed USR2, I was sending sec a HUP to get it to close all it's output files (for log rotation), but I was running into the problem that the HUP restart looses all