On 29 Jan 2008, at 00:38, Thomas McCabe wrote:
Check out Ramachandran:
"Without a doubt it is one of the most important discoveries ever
made about
the brain, Mirror neurons will do for psychology what DNA did for
biology.
They will provide a unifying framework and help explain a host of
On 29 Jan 2008, at 14:13, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 11:49 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
finite number of them for any given time,
On Jan 29, 2008 11:49 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
> > If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
> > finite number of them for any given time, so it shouldn't pose
> > structural prob
On 28 Jan 2008, at 22:31, Thomas McCabe wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 9:43 AM, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stathis: Are you simply arguing that an embodied AI that can
interact with
the
real world will find it easier to learn and develop, or are you
arguing that there is a fundament
> OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
> If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
> finite number of them for any given time, so it shouldn't pose
> structural problems.
The whacko, speculative SF hypothesis is that lateral movement btw
