WTF does this have to do with AGI or Singularity? I hope the AGI
gets here soon. We Stupid Monkeys get damn tiresome.
- samantha
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:06 AM, gifting wrote:
On 29 Jan 2008, at 14:13, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 11:49 AM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WTF (I can only assume what that stands for) are you such an angry
person. Or is linear thinking the only possible solution for your VotW
(guess what that stands for)?
Never heard of rhizome (theory). Sometimes stupid monkey things for
stupid monkeys like all of us and you are not that
Hi,
Just a contextualizing note: this is the Singularity list not the AGI list so
the scope of appropriate discussion is not so restricted.
In my view, whacky models of the universe are at least moderately
relevant to Singularity. After the Singularity, we are almost sure to discover
that our
On Saturday 02 February 2008, Samantha Atkins wrote:
I am not angry. I am bored with what seems like endless often off
subject prattling going nowhere.
Then go build something?
- Bryan
Bryan Bishop
http://heybryan.org/
-
This list is sponsored
OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
finite number of them for any given time, so it shouldn't pose
structural problems.
The whacko, speculative SF hypothesis is that lateral movement btw
On Jan 29, 2008 11:49 AM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
finite number of them for any given time, so it shouldn't pose
structural problems.
On 29 Jan 2008, at 14:13, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 11:49 AM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
finite number of them for any given time,
Can you define what you mean by decision more precisely, please?
OK, but why can't they all be dumped in a single 'normal' multiverse?
If traveling between them is accommodated by 'decisions', there is a
finite number of them for any given time, so it shouldn't pose
structural problems.
On Jan 28, 2008 2:17 PM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you define what you mean by decision more precisely, please?
That's difficult, I don't have it formalized. Something like
application of knowledge about the world, it's likely to end up an
intelligence-definition-complete
Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we can think about a multi-multiverse, i.e. a collection of multiverses,
with a certain probability distribution over them.
A probability distribution of what?
John K Clark
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or
On Jan 27, 2008 9:29 PM, John K Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we can think about a multi-multiverse, i.e. a collection of multiverses,
with a certain probability distribution over them.
A probability distribution of what?
Exactly. It needs stressing that
On Jan 27, 2008 5:26 PM, Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008 9:29 PM, John K Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we can think about a multi-multiverse, i.e. a collection of multiverses,
with a certain probability distribution over them.
Nesov wrote:
Exactly. It needs stressing that probability is a tool for
decision-making and it has no semantics when no decision enters the
picture.
...
What's it good for if it can't be used (= advance knowledge)? For
other purposes we'd be better off with specially designed random
Fans of extremely weird and silly speculative pseudo-science ideas may
appreciate my latest blog post, which posits a new
model of the universe ;-_)
http://www.goertzel.org/blog/blog.htm
(A... after a day spent largely on various business-
related hassles, the 30 minutes spent writing that
On Friday 25 January 2008, Ben Goertzel wrote:
Fans of extremely weird and silly speculative pseudo-science ideas
may appreciate my latest blog post, which posits a new
model of the universe ;-_)
Interesting post. I wonder, are you familiar with cosmological natural
selection and the likes of
15 matches
Mail list logo
