Ben,
I guess the issue I have with your critique is that you say that I have
given no details, no rigorous argument, just handwaving, etc.
But you are being contradictory: on the one hand you say that the
proposal is vague/underspecified/does not give any arguments but
then having
Hi Richard,
Let me go back to start of this dialogue...
Ben Goertzel wrote:
Loosemore wrote:
The motivational system of some types of AI (the types you would
classify as tainted by complexity) can be made so reliable that the
likelihood of them becoming unfriendly would be similar to the
Hi,
There is something about the gist of your response that seemed strange
to me, but I think I have put my finger on it: I am proposing a general
*class* of architectures for an AI-with-motivational-system. I am not
saying that this is a specific instance (with all the details nailed
down)
