J.A.R. Like I stated at the beginning, *most* models are at least
theoretically valid.
1. VALID MODELS/IDEAS. I am not aware of ONE model that has one valid or
even interesting idea about how to produce general intelligence - how to
get an agent to independently learn, or solve problems in, a
J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
I wonder why some people think there is one true path to AGI ... I
strongly suspect there are many...
Like I stated at the beginning, *most* models are at least theoretically
valid. Of course, tractable engineering of
bonjour à tous
question:is there a science behind AGI?
my feeling and thinking are
self-organisation,holism,contextual-syntatic-semantic and finally base on topos
response:our univers(multi,...) is meta-meta-meta-mathematical
cordialement votre
bruno
- Message d'origine
De : Richard
Just a thought, maybe there are some commonalities across AGI designs where
components could be built at a lower cost. An investor invests in the
company that builds component x that is used by multiple AGI projects. Then
you have your little AGI ecosystem of companies all competing yet
