Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake

2006-10-26 Thread Brett Tate
> 1) According to RFC 3261, why UAS state machine changes state > from "Proceeding" to "Terminated" after sending 200 OK? > Shouldn't it wait for matching ACK to actually reach > "Terminated" state. The following bug has been opened against rfc3261. http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=769

Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake

2006-10-26 Thread Manish Jain
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:sip-implementors- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 8:07 PM >> To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu >> Subject: [Sip-implementor

Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake

2006-10-25 Thread Markus Hofmann
TECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 8:07 PM >> To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu >> Subject: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake >> >> Hi, >> >> What was the intention behind proposing the need for sending ACK aft

Re: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake

2006-09-22 Thread B, Nataraju
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sip-implementors- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 8:07 PM > To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake > > Hi, > >

[Sip-implementors] 3-way handshake

2006-09-18 Thread moin
Hi, What was the intention behind proposing the need for sending ACK after 200OK of INVITE under SIP. ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors