Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-14 Thread Nataraju A B
EMAIL PROTECTED]; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu; 'Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)' Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses You said, "Due malfunctioning by the proxy the UAC may receive the multiple non-2xx responses as part of the same call. If this new failure respon

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Kasturi Narayanan
27;Andy Pandaram' Cc: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)' Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses Comments inline... Thanks & Regards, Nataraju A.B. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Anshuman Rawat
ip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses Is it possible for a UAC to receive multiple non-2xx responses for an INVITE (because a call was forked and the forking proxy sent through both of them to a UAC)? What should be the UAC behavior in such a scenario? - Andy Send instant messages

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Nataraju A B
/LMF) Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses I dont know if this case is possible. I think the stateful proxy will not forward all the non-2xx responses back to the originating UAC. You will only get one non-2xx response. Forking of INVITE at proxy will create new Transaction st

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Asheesh Joshi
/LMF) Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andy Pandaram Cc: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses I thought the question was about non-2xx response... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses Hi Andy, As per RFC 3261, Multiple 2xx responses may arrive at the UAC for a single INVITE request due to a forking proxy. Each response can be distinguished by the tag parameter in the To header field. Thus, each represents a distinct dialog, with a distinct

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread shivani . garg
Hi Andy, As per RFC 3261, Multiple 2xx responses may arrive at the UAC for a single INVITE request due to a forking proxy. Each response can be distinguished by the tag parameter in the To header field. Thus, each represents a distinct dialog, with a distinct dialog identifier. And the UAC

Re: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses Is it possible for a UAC to receive multiple non-2xx responses for an INVITE (because a call was forked and the forking proxy sent through both of them to a UAC)? What should be the UAC behavior in such a sce

[Sip-implementors] Multiple non- 2xx responses

2006-01-13 Thread Andy Pandaram
Is it possible for a UAC to receive multiple non-2xx responses for an INVITE (because a call was forked and the forking proxy sent through both of them to a UAC)? What should be the UAC behavior in such a scenario? - Andy Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yah