nyone?
Regards,
Sachin
-Original Message-
From: Ashish Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 2:28 PM
To: Sachin; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
Hey Sachin,
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
I think I made a mi
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/05/2006 12:52 PM
To
"Flex Radha Krishna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
cc
Subject
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
Hi,
Timer B would normally stop on a 1xx response from the other side.
Regards,
Ashish
__
, then it would
also be acknowledged by an ACK, this way.
Thanks anyways.
Ashish
-Original Message-
From: Sachin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 2:17 PM
To: Ashish Kumar; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
Hi Ashish
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ashish Kumar
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:00 PM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
Hi,
I have question on following scenario.
A ---(Invite)--> B
A <--(183) B
A <--(200) B
A ---(ACK)-->
Invite.
Regards,
Ashish
From: Flex Radha Krishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:33 PM
To: Ashish Kumar; sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-
entors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
B should retransmit re-invite and wait for 487 or some final response for
Re-INVITE.
Regards
S.Radha krishna
Ashish Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have question on following sc
ct: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
B should retransmit re-invite and wait for 487 or some final response for
Re-INVITE.
Regards
S.Radha krishna
Ashish Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have question on following scenario.
A ---(Invite)--&g
@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
B should retransmit re-invite and wait for 487 or some final response
for Re-INVITE.
Regards
S.Radha krishna
Ashish Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have question on following sc
[inline]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ashish
Kumar
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:00 PM
To: sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query on Re-Invite
Hi,
I have question on following scenario.
A ---(Invite
I think this is a race codition in the applcation and not in the
stack.If A received the re-Invite, it should respond to the
trasaction with a final response even if it sent a BYE. Regardless of
the status of the response, whether its an acceptance of the invite via
a 200 Ok or a 3xx-6xx r
Hi Ashish,
See innline ...
Rgds,
Amar
The greatest enemy of best is "good." If you're willing to accept "good"
you'll never be the "Best."
"Ashish Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/04/2006 03:00 PM
To
cc
B should retransmit re-invite and wait for 487 or some final response for
Re-INVITE.
Regards
S.Radha krishna
Ashish Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have question on following scenario.
A ---(Invite)--> B
A <--(183) B
A <--(200) B
A ---(ACK)--> B
A <--(Re-Invi
Hi,
I have question on following scenario.
A ---(Invite)--> B
A <--(183) B
A <--(200) B
A ---(ACK)--> B
A <--(Re-Invite)--- B
A --- (Bye) ---> B
A <-- (200 for Bye) B
What should be the behavior after this.
Should B stop retransmitting Re-Invite and the
13 matches
Mail list logo
