Hi Dave,
We (OpenSIPS project) had several systems deployed (including
production) with both IPv6 and IPv4, able to do bridging between the two
networks at SIP level.
What exactly are you looking to be shared ?
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
In the IETF Sipcore working group, we're starting work on "Happy
Eyeballs for SIP", getting systems that use both IPv4 and IPv6 to work
well, even in situations where connectivity in IPv6 is not assured. We
expect that the changes to the SIP specifications will be small or none,
but that there
On 2/17/16 6:59 AM, Brett Tate wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Paul that the header can be ignored; however the header is
registered with IANA and is discussed within RFC 3261.
Oops!!!
Of course you are right. I must have misread the name in the query.
Sorry!
It looks like the header is only
Hi,
I agree with Paul that the header can be ignored; however the header is
registered with IANA and is discussed within RFC 3261.
It looks like the header is only defined for responses (although Table 2
may be incomplete).
RFC 3261 may contain better quotes to ignore the header and continue
