Filippos Vasilakis writes:
> On the other hand, in RFC3665, section 3.11, does not copy the Route
> headers to the ACK and this is confusing. Seems like RFC3665 is in error,
> but again to me it seems that appending Route headers in a transaction ACK
> is pointless, since the final downstream
Hello folks,
I have a question related to SIP protocol, if anyone knows cause I am a bit
confused.
I have an INVITE transaction which contains a Route header as it needs to
go through a proxy. The final downstream responds with a non-2xx (480)
which is routed back to the initial upstream. My
