Re: [Sip-implementors] Secure VoIP

2009-02-27 Thread BONNAERENS Ben
Hi Theo, On the same note, it's shocking how many devices bail out after receiving a 503 and just give up. Please, implementers: 503 does not mean never try registering again. Let me refine this statement a bit: 503 also does not mean immediately retry to register One should respect the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Secure VoIP

2009-02-27 Thread Theo Zourzouvillys
Hi Ben, On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:51 AM, BONNAERENS Ben ben.bonnaer...@alcatel-lucent.be wrote: On the same note, it's shocking how many devices bail out after receiving a 503 and just give up.  Please, implementers: 503 does not mean never try registering again. Let me refine this

Re: [Sip-implementors] Secure VoIP

2009-02-26 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
I think this statement is a bit overreacted. I'm part of the implementers group, but I cannot say that IETF should take a break to allow implementers to align...of course this depends on implementers and how good they are in doing the job. But what I notice on SIPit in Lannion was a bit