Thanks a lot.
Even I feel anchoring node should validate the
"access-type"/"access-class".
and check the length of the "access-info".
Thanks
Basu
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Amardeep wrote:
> Hi Basu,
>
> Yes, PVNI header must needed to be validated by Anchoring node.
> For LTE., eNode o
Hi Basu,
Yes, PVNI header must needed to be validated by Anchoring node.
For LTE., eNode or for WIFI AP/elec must validate PVNI header if it same which
is assigned to user during boot process.
Thanks,
Amar
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10-Feb-2016, at 10:47 am, ankur bansal wrote:
>
> Hi Basu
>
Hi Basu
PANI header coming from UA will be having all information in this header
from the access network where UA has latched to during bootup and got IP
connectivity .So PANI header is most specific to UA rather than any proxy
or AS.
Now whether AS should consider PANI or not depends upon if AS
